Abstract
Design: Qualitative.
Methods: Framework analysis of semi-structured interviews with 19 people aged 14-17 years.
Results: Participants judged their risk of getting bowel cancer as low. This was based on a lack of family history of cancer and their current lifestyle behaviours, which were viewed as having a protective effect, or because they planned on making change to their lifestyle in the future when disease risk became more relevant. Participants were not aware of, and struggled to understand, the link between PA and bowel cancer. They also lacked knowledge of the effects of, or treatments for, bowel cancer. Beliefs underlying judgements about the risk of bowel cancer fitted the IRR framework reasonably well.
Conclusions: The present research suggests that interventions designed to increase PA with a view to reducing the risk of bowel cancer should aim to make the future risk of bowel cancer feel more tangible, help young people to understand the full range of consequences, explain how and why preventative behaviours such as PA are effective in reducing risk, and emphasise that the typical late presentation of symptoms, and therefore investigation by healthcare services, reduces treatability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 449-462 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | British Journal of Health Psychology |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 17 Apr 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sep 2017 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Risk appraisal
- bowel cancer
- physical activity
- Common Sense Model
- Illness Risk Representations Framework
Cite this
Young people’s beliefs about the risk of bowel cancer and its link with physical activity. / Newby, Katie; Cook, Chloe; Meisel, Susanne F.; Webb, Thomas L.; Fisher, Bernadette; Fisher, Abi.
In: British Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 3, 09.2017, p. 449-462.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Young people’s beliefs about the risk of bowel cancer and its link with physical activity
AU - Newby, Katie
AU - Cook, Chloe
AU - Meisel, Susanne F.
AU - Webb, Thomas L.
AU - Fisher, Bernadette
AU - Fisher, Abi
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Objectives: The primary objective was to explore young people’s risk appraisals of bowel cancer, including whether they had a coherent understanding of the protective effects of physical activity (PA). A secondary objective was to examine whether the Illness Risk Representations (IRR) framework could be used to understand beliefs underlying bowel cancer risk appraisals. Design: Qualitative. Methods: Framework analysis of semi-structured interviews with 19 people aged 14-17 years. Results: Participants judged their risk of getting bowel cancer as low. This was based on a lack of family history of cancer and their current lifestyle behaviours, which were viewed as having a protective effect, or because they planned on making change to their lifestyle in the future when disease risk became more relevant. Participants were not aware of, and struggled to understand, the link between PA and bowel cancer. They also lacked knowledge of the effects of, or treatments for, bowel cancer. Beliefs underlying judgements about the risk of bowel cancer fitted the IRR framework reasonably well.Conclusions: The present research suggests that interventions designed to increase PA with a view to reducing the risk of bowel cancer should aim to make the future risk of bowel cancer feel more tangible, help young people to understand the full range of consequences, explain how and why preventative behaviours such as PA are effective in reducing risk, and emphasise that the typical late presentation of symptoms, and therefore investigation by healthcare services, reduces treatability.
AB - Objectives: The primary objective was to explore young people’s risk appraisals of bowel cancer, including whether they had a coherent understanding of the protective effects of physical activity (PA). A secondary objective was to examine whether the Illness Risk Representations (IRR) framework could be used to understand beliefs underlying bowel cancer risk appraisals. Design: Qualitative. Methods: Framework analysis of semi-structured interviews with 19 people aged 14-17 years. Results: Participants judged their risk of getting bowel cancer as low. This was based on a lack of family history of cancer and their current lifestyle behaviours, which were viewed as having a protective effect, or because they planned on making change to their lifestyle in the future when disease risk became more relevant. Participants were not aware of, and struggled to understand, the link between PA and bowel cancer. They also lacked knowledge of the effects of, or treatments for, bowel cancer. Beliefs underlying judgements about the risk of bowel cancer fitted the IRR framework reasonably well.Conclusions: The present research suggests that interventions designed to increase PA with a view to reducing the risk of bowel cancer should aim to make the future risk of bowel cancer feel more tangible, help young people to understand the full range of consequences, explain how and why preventative behaviours such as PA are effective in reducing risk, and emphasise that the typical late presentation of symptoms, and therefore investigation by healthcare services, reduces treatability.
KW - Risk appraisal
KW - bowel cancer
KW - physical activity
KW - Common Sense Model
KW - Illness Risk Representations Framework
U2 - 10.1111/bjhp.12238
DO - 10.1111/bjhp.12238
M3 - Article
VL - 22
SP - 449
EP - 462
JO - British Journal of Health Psychology
JF - British Journal of Health Psychology
SN - 1359-107X
IS - 3
ER -