Abstract
Clinical practice and public health policy decisions depend on high-quality information about research findings. However, growing evidence shows widespread deficiencies in the reporting of health research studies. Problematic issues include (but are not limited to) nonreporting or delayed reporting of entire studies (1); omission of crucial information in the description of research methods (2) and interventions (3); selective reporting of only some outcomes (4); presenting data and graphs in confusing and misleading ways (5); and omissions from or misinterpretation of results in abstracts (6). These deficiencies have serious consequences for clinical practice, research, policy making, and ultimately for patients.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2-3 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Annals of Internal Medicine |
| Volume | 151 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Aug 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Cited By :6Export Date: 26 July 2021
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Writing a research article that is "fit for purpose": EQUATOR network and reporting guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS