Who thinks that part D is too complicated? Survey results on the medicare prescription drug benefit

Janet R. Cummings, Thomas Rice, Yaniv Hanoch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence suggests that Medicare Part D plan ownership is “sticky”; beneficiaries are unlikely to change plans from year to year, even when it would be in their financial interest to do so. The complexity of the program may contribute to this problem. Using data from a national survey, the authors examine the characteristics of those who believe that Part D is too complicated as well as the characteristics of those who endorse one of two policies to simplify the program. The results indicate that a great majority of adults believe that the program is too complicated and most favor some form of simplification. In multivariate analyses, one of the most consistent predictors is political orientation. Republicans are significantly less likely to think that Part D is too complicated, and liberals and moderates are significantly more likely to favor allowing beneficiaries the option of purchasing a plan directly from the government.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-115
Number of pages19
JournalMedical Care Research and Review
Volume66
Issue number1
Early online date16 Sept 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who thinks that part D is too complicated? Survey results on the medicare prescription drug benefit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this