Who Should Regulate Extremist Content Online?

Alastair Reed, Adam Henschke

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

As liberal democracies grapple with the evolution of online political
extremism, in addition to governments, social media and internet infrastructure
companies have found themselves making more and more decisions about who gets to use their platforms, and what people say online. This raises the question that this paper explores, who should regulate extremist content online? In doing so the first part of the paper examines the evolution of the increasing role that social media and internet infrastructure companies have come to play in the regulating extremist content online, and the ethical challenges this presents. The second part of the paper explores three ethical challenges: i) the moral legitimacy of private actors, ii) the concentration of power in the hands of a few actors and iii) the lack of separation of powers in the content regulation process by private actors.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCounter-Terrorism, Ethics and Technology:
Subtitle of host publicationEmerging Challenges at the Frontiers of Counter-Terrorism
EditorsAdam Henschke, Alastair Reed, Scott Robbins, Seumas Miller
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages175-198
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-030-90221-6
ISBN (Print)978-3-030-90220-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who Should Regulate Extremist Content Online?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this