Where is the value-added in the cluster approach? Hermeneutic theorizing, economic geography and clusters as a multi-perspectival approach

Paul Benneworth, Nick Henry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Barnes has argued that (new) economic geography has moved in to a phase of theory development that he describes as 'hermeneutic' theorising. This epistemological position is characterised by an interpretive, reflexive and open-ended mode of inquiry that recognises the diversity of sources available for theorising and the subsequent conversations that will ensue from such diversity. In a recent deconstruction of the clusters concept in economic geography, and especially that version (or brand) expounded by Michael Porter, Martin and Sunley ask the question as to what added value is delivered by the concept's gatecrashing of academic and policy debates. This paper argues that clusters should not be overendowed as a singular 'brand', but recognised as an emergent set of multiple perspectives in dialogue. From a position of hermeneutic theorising, 'clusters' have the potential to add value by allowing theoretical debate across a wide range of (overlapping and competing) perspectives whose partiality and situatedness are made explicit. The possibilities for theoretical, empirical and policy cross-fertilisation from the difficult act of holding together these threads is one potential drawn from the conversations engendered through hermeneutic theorising in economic geography. Nevertheless, this 'work in progress' must be deepened and extended if the potential of clusters is to be realised.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1011-1023
Number of pages13
JournalUrban Studies
Volume41
Issue number5/6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2004

Fingerprint

hermeneutics
economic geography
value added
conversation
partiality
development theory
theory formation
dialogue
policy

Cite this

Where is the value-added in the cluster approach? Hermeneutic theorizing, economic geography and clusters as a multi-perspectival approach. / Benneworth, Paul; Henry, Nick.

In: Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 5/6, 01.05.2004, p. 1011-1023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63379a9a69764862834a4d1c79d85575,
title = "Where is the value-added in the cluster approach? Hermeneutic theorizing, economic geography and clusters as a multi-perspectival approach",
abstract = "Barnes has argued that (new) economic geography has moved in to a phase of theory development that he describes as 'hermeneutic' theorising. This epistemological position is characterised by an interpretive, reflexive and open-ended mode of inquiry that recognises the diversity of sources available for theorising and the subsequent conversations that will ensue from such diversity. In a recent deconstruction of the clusters concept in economic geography, and especially that version (or brand) expounded by Michael Porter, Martin and Sunley ask the question as to what added value is delivered by the concept's gatecrashing of academic and policy debates. This paper argues that clusters should not be overendowed as a singular 'brand', but recognised as an emergent set of multiple perspectives in dialogue. From a position of hermeneutic theorising, 'clusters' have the potential to add value by allowing theoretical debate across a wide range of (overlapping and competing) perspectives whose partiality and situatedness are made explicit. The possibilities for theoretical, empirical and policy cross-fertilisation from the difficult act of holding together these threads is one potential drawn from the conversations engendered through hermeneutic theorising in economic geography. Nevertheless, this 'work in progress' must be deepened and extended if the potential of clusters is to be realised.",
author = "Paul Benneworth and Nick Henry",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00420980410001675869",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1011--1023",
journal = "Urban Studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "5/6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where is the value-added in the cluster approach? Hermeneutic theorizing, economic geography and clusters as a multi-perspectival approach

AU - Benneworth, Paul

AU - Henry, Nick

PY - 2004/5/1

Y1 - 2004/5/1

N2 - Barnes has argued that (new) economic geography has moved in to a phase of theory development that he describes as 'hermeneutic' theorising. This epistemological position is characterised by an interpretive, reflexive and open-ended mode of inquiry that recognises the diversity of sources available for theorising and the subsequent conversations that will ensue from such diversity. In a recent deconstruction of the clusters concept in economic geography, and especially that version (or brand) expounded by Michael Porter, Martin and Sunley ask the question as to what added value is delivered by the concept's gatecrashing of academic and policy debates. This paper argues that clusters should not be overendowed as a singular 'brand', but recognised as an emergent set of multiple perspectives in dialogue. From a position of hermeneutic theorising, 'clusters' have the potential to add value by allowing theoretical debate across a wide range of (overlapping and competing) perspectives whose partiality and situatedness are made explicit. The possibilities for theoretical, empirical and policy cross-fertilisation from the difficult act of holding together these threads is one potential drawn from the conversations engendered through hermeneutic theorising in economic geography. Nevertheless, this 'work in progress' must be deepened and extended if the potential of clusters is to be realised.

AB - Barnes has argued that (new) economic geography has moved in to a phase of theory development that he describes as 'hermeneutic' theorising. This epistemological position is characterised by an interpretive, reflexive and open-ended mode of inquiry that recognises the diversity of sources available for theorising and the subsequent conversations that will ensue from such diversity. In a recent deconstruction of the clusters concept in economic geography, and especially that version (or brand) expounded by Michael Porter, Martin and Sunley ask the question as to what added value is delivered by the concept's gatecrashing of academic and policy debates. This paper argues that clusters should not be overendowed as a singular 'brand', but recognised as an emergent set of multiple perspectives in dialogue. From a position of hermeneutic theorising, 'clusters' have the potential to add value by allowing theoretical debate across a wide range of (overlapping and competing) perspectives whose partiality and situatedness are made explicit. The possibilities for theoretical, empirical and policy cross-fertilisation from the difficult act of holding together these threads is one potential drawn from the conversations engendered through hermeneutic theorising in economic geography. Nevertheless, this 'work in progress' must be deepened and extended if the potential of clusters is to be realised.

U2 - 10.1080/00420980410001675869

DO - 10.1080/00420980410001675869

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 1011

EP - 1023

JO - Urban Studies

JF - Urban Studies

SN - 0042-0980

IS - 5/6

ER -