What Works? A Critique of Appreciative Inquiry as a Research Method/ology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

561 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Appreciative Inquiry (AI) has gained prominence as an organizational development approach. For over 15 years, it has had varied use in higher education research as a methodology and as a collection of methods. Perhaps the most consistently used, yet most criticized, aspect of AI is the positive stance that its adherents adopt. In this chapter, we survey the prevalence and use of AI, both in the wider literature and in higher education research. We offer our own case study to illustrate the practicalities of employing it and discuss our findings. We suggest that educational researchers are overlooking relevant AI research published within other disciplines; that our own and other case stories can provide guidance for the use of AI in academic contexts; and that AI’s collaborative and positive standpoint has potential as a research methodology influencing policy.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTheory and Method in Higher Education Research, Vol. 1: Theory and method in higher education research II (Vol. 10).
EditorsJeroen Huisman, Malcolm Tight
Place of PublicationBingley, UK
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Limited
Pages169-190
ISBN (Print)978-1-78560-287-0, 978-1-78560-286-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

research method
organizational development
methodology
artificial intelligence
education

Cite this

Clouder, D. L., & King, V. (2015). What Works? A Critique of Appreciative Inquiry as a Research Method/ology. In J. Huisman, & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, Vol. 1: Theory and method in higher education research II (Vol. 10). (pp. 169-190). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220150000001008

What Works? A Critique of Appreciative Inquiry as a Research Method/ology. / Clouder, Deanne L.; King, Virginia.

Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, Vol. 1: Theory and method in higher education research II (Vol. 10).. ed. / Jeroen Huisman; Malcolm Tight. Bingley, UK : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015. p. 169-190.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Clouder, DL & King, V 2015, What Works? A Critique of Appreciative Inquiry as a Research Method/ology. in J Huisman & M Tight (eds), Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, Vol. 1: Theory and method in higher education research II (Vol. 10).. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK, pp. 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220150000001008
Clouder DL, King V. What Works? A Critique of Appreciative Inquiry as a Research Method/ology. In Huisman J, Tight M, editors, Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, Vol. 1: Theory and method in higher education research II (Vol. 10).. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 2015. p. 169-190 https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220150000001008
Clouder, Deanne L. ; King, Virginia. / What Works? A Critique of Appreciative Inquiry as a Research Method/ology. Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, Vol. 1: Theory and method in higher education research II (Vol. 10).. editor / Jeroen Huisman ; Malcolm Tight. Bingley, UK : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015. pp. 169-190
@inbook{94660a5e8cf14fba998519f598ab424a,
title = "What Works? A Critique of Appreciative Inquiry as a Research Method/ology",
abstract = "Appreciative Inquiry (AI) has gained prominence as an organizational development approach. For over 15 years, it has had varied use in higher education research as a methodology and as a collection of methods. Perhaps the most consistently used, yet most criticized, aspect of AI is the positive stance that its adherents adopt. In this chapter, we survey the prevalence and use of AI, both in the wider literature and in higher education research. We offer our own case study to illustrate the practicalities of employing it and discuss our findings. We suggest that educational researchers are overlooking relevant AI research published within other disciplines; that our own and other case stories can provide guidance for the use of AI in academic contexts; and that AI’s collaborative and positive standpoint has potential as a research methodology influencing policy.",
author = "Clouder, {Deanne L.} and Virginia King",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/S2056-375220150000001008",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-78560-287-0",
pages = "169--190",
editor = "Jeroen Huisman and Malcolm Tight",
booktitle = "Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, Vol. 1: Theory and method in higher education research II (Vol. 10).",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Limited",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - What Works? A Critique of Appreciative Inquiry as a Research Method/ology

AU - Clouder, Deanne L.

AU - King, Virginia

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Appreciative Inquiry (AI) has gained prominence as an organizational development approach. For over 15 years, it has had varied use in higher education research as a methodology and as a collection of methods. Perhaps the most consistently used, yet most criticized, aspect of AI is the positive stance that its adherents adopt. In this chapter, we survey the prevalence and use of AI, both in the wider literature and in higher education research. We offer our own case study to illustrate the practicalities of employing it and discuss our findings. We suggest that educational researchers are overlooking relevant AI research published within other disciplines; that our own and other case stories can provide guidance for the use of AI in academic contexts; and that AI’s collaborative and positive standpoint has potential as a research methodology influencing policy.

AB - Appreciative Inquiry (AI) has gained prominence as an organizational development approach. For over 15 years, it has had varied use in higher education research as a methodology and as a collection of methods. Perhaps the most consistently used, yet most criticized, aspect of AI is the positive stance that its adherents adopt. In this chapter, we survey the prevalence and use of AI, both in the wider literature and in higher education research. We offer our own case study to illustrate the practicalities of employing it and discuss our findings. We suggest that educational researchers are overlooking relevant AI research published within other disciplines; that our own and other case stories can provide guidance for the use of AI in academic contexts; and that AI’s collaborative and positive standpoint has potential as a research methodology influencing policy.

U2 - 10.1108/S2056-375220150000001008

DO - 10.1108/S2056-375220150000001008

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-78560-287-0

SN - 978-1-78560-286-3

SP - 169

EP - 190

BT - Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, Vol. 1: Theory and method in higher education research II (Vol. 10).

A2 - Huisman, Jeroen

A2 - Tight, Malcolm

PB - Emerald Group Publishing Limited

CY - Bingley, UK

ER -