What Went Wrong with Walras? The Econometric Transformation Process of Walrasian Economics during the 1920s and 1930s

Albert Jolink

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This paper will address the issue of the reception and transformation of Lé on Walras’s work among some econometricians during the 1920s and 1930s. As set out in the paper, the reception of Walras’s work is related to the importance of the role of statistics, the dynamic representations of a changing reality and the consistency of simultaneous equations modelling.
The main contribution of this article lies perhaps in detecting these (different) reasons ‘what went wrong with Walras’ but should also be seen in the light of an extrapolated discussion of the current relevance of Léon Walras work and his legacy for modern political economy.
The conclusion is that the reception of Walras’s work by the early econometricians (statisticians and mathematicians together) was lukewarm, partly because it represented the wrong ideas and partly because of ignorance. When and where Walras’s work was discussed it was mainly as a starting point to illustrate the relevance of the changes suggested by the newly founded econometric discipline. At the end of the day, this may illustrate the development of the economic discipline, but perhaps even more importantly it may reveal the need for weaving Walras’s applied and social economics into our present-day Walrasian texture.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFrom Walras to Pareto
Subtitle of host publicationPart 1
EditorsJurgen Backhaus, J. A. Hans Maks
Place of PublicationBerlin
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages69-81
Number of pages13
Volume4
ISBN (Electronic)978-0-387-33757-9
ISBN (Print)978-0-387-33756-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Publication series

NameThe European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences
PublisherSpringer
Volume4

Fingerprint

Reception
Economics
1920s
1930s
Mathematicians
Statistics
Modeling
Equations
Ignorance
Texture
Political Economy

Keywords

  • Walras
  • Statistics
  • Economic Dynamics
  • B13
  • B23
  • B31

Cite this

Jolink, A. (2006). What Went Wrong with Walras? The Econometric Transformation Process of Walrasian Economics during the 1920s and 1930s. In J. Backhaus, & J. A. H. Maks (Eds.), From Walras to Pareto: Part 1 (Vol. 4, pp. 69-81). (The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences; Vol. 4). Berlin: Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33757-9_6

What Went Wrong with Walras? The Econometric Transformation Process of Walrasian Economics during the 1920s and 1930s. / Jolink, Albert.

From Walras to Pareto: Part 1. ed. / Jurgen Backhaus; J. A. Hans Maks. Vol. 4 Berlin : Springer Verlag, 2006. p. 69-81 (The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences; Vol. 4).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Jolink, A 2006, What Went Wrong with Walras? The Econometric Transformation Process of Walrasian Economics during the 1920s and 1930s. in J Backhaus & JAH Maks (eds), From Walras to Pareto: Part 1. vol. 4, The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences, vol. 4, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33757-9_6
Jolink A. What Went Wrong with Walras? The Econometric Transformation Process of Walrasian Economics during the 1920s and 1930s. In Backhaus J, Maks JAH, editors, From Walras to Pareto: Part 1. Vol. 4. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 2006. p. 69-81. (The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33757-9_6
Jolink, Albert. / What Went Wrong with Walras? The Econometric Transformation Process of Walrasian Economics during the 1920s and 1930s. From Walras to Pareto: Part 1. editor / Jurgen Backhaus ; J. A. Hans Maks. Vol. 4 Berlin : Springer Verlag, 2006. pp. 69-81 (The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences).
@inbook{5446043ffba249349ecec3a63026bcce,
title = "What Went Wrong with Walras?: The Econometric Transformation Process of Walrasian Economics during the 1920s and 1930s",
abstract = "This paper will address the issue of the reception and transformation of L{\'e} on Walras’s work among some econometricians during the 1920s and 1930s. As set out in the paper, the reception of Walras’s work is related to the importance of the role of statistics, the dynamic representations of a changing reality and the consistency of simultaneous equations modelling.The main contribution of this article lies perhaps in detecting these (different) reasons ‘what went wrong with Walras’ but should also be seen in the light of an extrapolated discussion of the current relevance of L{\'e}on Walras work and his legacy for modern political economy.The conclusion is that the reception of Walras’s work by the early econometricians (statisticians and mathematicians together) was lukewarm, partly because it represented the wrong ideas and partly because of ignorance. When and where Walras’s work was discussed it was mainly as a starting point to illustrate the relevance of the changes suggested by the newly founded econometric discipline. At the end of the day, this may illustrate the development of the economic discipline, but perhaps even more importantly it may reveal the need for weaving Walras’s applied and social economics into our present-day Walrasian texture.",
keywords = "Walras, Statistics, Economic Dynamics, B13, B23, B31",
author = "Albert Jolink",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1007/978-0-387-33757-9_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-387-33756-2",
volume = "4",
series = "The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "69--81",
editor = "Jurgen Backhaus and Maks, {J. A. Hans}",
booktitle = "From Walras to Pareto",
address = "Austria",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - What Went Wrong with Walras?

T2 - The Econometric Transformation Process of Walrasian Economics during the 1920s and 1930s

AU - Jolink, Albert

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This paper will address the issue of the reception and transformation of Lé on Walras’s work among some econometricians during the 1920s and 1930s. As set out in the paper, the reception of Walras’s work is related to the importance of the role of statistics, the dynamic representations of a changing reality and the consistency of simultaneous equations modelling.The main contribution of this article lies perhaps in detecting these (different) reasons ‘what went wrong with Walras’ but should also be seen in the light of an extrapolated discussion of the current relevance of Léon Walras work and his legacy for modern political economy.The conclusion is that the reception of Walras’s work by the early econometricians (statisticians and mathematicians together) was lukewarm, partly because it represented the wrong ideas and partly because of ignorance. When and where Walras’s work was discussed it was mainly as a starting point to illustrate the relevance of the changes suggested by the newly founded econometric discipline. At the end of the day, this may illustrate the development of the economic discipline, but perhaps even more importantly it may reveal the need for weaving Walras’s applied and social economics into our present-day Walrasian texture.

AB - This paper will address the issue of the reception and transformation of Lé on Walras’s work among some econometricians during the 1920s and 1930s. As set out in the paper, the reception of Walras’s work is related to the importance of the role of statistics, the dynamic representations of a changing reality and the consistency of simultaneous equations modelling.The main contribution of this article lies perhaps in detecting these (different) reasons ‘what went wrong with Walras’ but should also be seen in the light of an extrapolated discussion of the current relevance of Léon Walras work and his legacy for modern political economy.The conclusion is that the reception of Walras’s work by the early econometricians (statisticians and mathematicians together) was lukewarm, partly because it represented the wrong ideas and partly because of ignorance. When and where Walras’s work was discussed it was mainly as a starting point to illustrate the relevance of the changes suggested by the newly founded econometric discipline. At the end of the day, this may illustrate the development of the economic discipline, but perhaps even more importantly it may reveal the need for weaving Walras’s applied and social economics into our present-day Walrasian texture.

KW - Walras

KW - Statistics

KW - Economic Dynamics

KW - B13

KW - B23

KW - B31

U2 - 10.1007/978-0-387-33757-9_6

DO - 10.1007/978-0-387-33757-9_6

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-0-387-33756-2

VL - 4

T3 - The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences

SP - 69

EP - 81

BT - From Walras to Pareto

A2 - Backhaus, Jurgen

A2 - Maks, J. A. Hans

PB - Springer Verlag

CY - Berlin

ER -