Visually induced motion sickness: Single- versus dual-axis motion

Cyriel Diels, P.A. Howarth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The majority of studies into visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) either use complex motion scenarios or are limited to single-axis motion. This study compared VIMS during single- and dual-axis motion. Twelve participants were exposed to (i) oscillating roll motion, (ii) linear motion in the fore-and-aft axis, and (iii) spiral motion, i.e. the summed direction of both of these flow vectors. Increased sensory conflict during exposure to spiral motion was hypothesised to increase the level of VIMS compared with exposure to its constituent motion patterns in isolation. Unexpectedly, spiral motion was not found to be more provocative than either of the two single-axis motion patterns, and this finding appears to be inconsistent with VIMS being determined by simple summation of the provocative stimuli. In the spiral motion condition, an atypical decrease in VIMS was observed during exposure, which was consistently preceded by a reduction in reported vection. It was hypothesised that the abstract nature as well as the unusual motion profile in the spiral motion condition may have rendered the stimulus increasingly ‘improbable’ and ultimately being disregarded, or ‘quarantined’, as an orientation cue by the central nervous system. The results are discussed in the context of methodological consequences for VIMS research and potential limitations of the use of abstract stimuli.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175–180
JournalDisplays
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Neurology

Bibliographical note

The full text of this item is not available from the repository.
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Displays. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Displays [Vol 32, Issue 4, (2011)] DOI 10.1016/j.displa.2011.02.005 .

Keywords

  • simulator sickness
  • dual-axis motion
  • ecological validity
  • quarantining

Cite this

Visually induced motion sickness: Single- versus dual-axis motion. / Diels, Cyriel; Howarth, P.A.

In: Displays, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2011, p. 175–180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Diels, Cyriel ; Howarth, P.A. / Visually induced motion sickness: Single- versus dual-axis motion. In: Displays. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 175–180.
@article{a6850bd266b8409d918607e4bf4dae6e,
title = "Visually induced motion sickness: Single- versus dual-axis motion",
abstract = "The majority of studies into visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) either use complex motion scenarios or are limited to single-axis motion. This study compared VIMS during single- and dual-axis motion. Twelve participants were exposed to (i) oscillating roll motion, (ii) linear motion in the fore-and-aft axis, and (iii) spiral motion, i.e. the summed direction of both of these flow vectors. Increased sensory conflict during exposure to spiral motion was hypothesised to increase the level of VIMS compared with exposure to its constituent motion patterns in isolation. Unexpectedly, spiral motion was not found to be more provocative than either of the two single-axis motion patterns, and this finding appears to be inconsistent with VIMS being determined by simple summation of the provocative stimuli. In the spiral motion condition, an atypical decrease in VIMS was observed during exposure, which was consistently preceded by a reduction in reported vection. It was hypothesised that the abstract nature as well as the unusual motion profile in the spiral motion condition may have rendered the stimulus increasingly ‘improbable’ and ultimately being disregarded, or ‘quarantined’, as an orientation cue by the central nervous system. The results are discussed in the context of methodological consequences for VIMS research and potential limitations of the use of abstract stimuli.",
keywords = "simulator sickness, dual-axis motion, ecological validity, quarantining",
author = "Cyriel Diels and P.A. Howarth",
note = "The full text of this item is not available from the repository. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Displays. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Displays [Vol 32, Issue 4, (2011)] DOI 10.1016/j.displa.2011.02.005 .",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.displa.2011.02.005",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "175–180",
journal = "Displays",
issn = "0141-9382",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visually induced motion sickness: Single- versus dual-axis motion

AU - Diels, Cyriel

AU - Howarth, P.A.

N1 - The full text of this item is not available from the repository. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Displays. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Displays [Vol 32, Issue 4, (2011)] DOI 10.1016/j.displa.2011.02.005 .

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The majority of studies into visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) either use complex motion scenarios or are limited to single-axis motion. This study compared VIMS during single- and dual-axis motion. Twelve participants were exposed to (i) oscillating roll motion, (ii) linear motion in the fore-and-aft axis, and (iii) spiral motion, i.e. the summed direction of both of these flow vectors. Increased sensory conflict during exposure to spiral motion was hypothesised to increase the level of VIMS compared with exposure to its constituent motion patterns in isolation. Unexpectedly, spiral motion was not found to be more provocative than either of the two single-axis motion patterns, and this finding appears to be inconsistent with VIMS being determined by simple summation of the provocative stimuli. In the spiral motion condition, an atypical decrease in VIMS was observed during exposure, which was consistently preceded by a reduction in reported vection. It was hypothesised that the abstract nature as well as the unusual motion profile in the spiral motion condition may have rendered the stimulus increasingly ‘improbable’ and ultimately being disregarded, or ‘quarantined’, as an orientation cue by the central nervous system. The results are discussed in the context of methodological consequences for VIMS research and potential limitations of the use of abstract stimuli.

AB - The majority of studies into visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) either use complex motion scenarios or are limited to single-axis motion. This study compared VIMS during single- and dual-axis motion. Twelve participants were exposed to (i) oscillating roll motion, (ii) linear motion in the fore-and-aft axis, and (iii) spiral motion, i.e. the summed direction of both of these flow vectors. Increased sensory conflict during exposure to spiral motion was hypothesised to increase the level of VIMS compared with exposure to its constituent motion patterns in isolation. Unexpectedly, spiral motion was not found to be more provocative than either of the two single-axis motion patterns, and this finding appears to be inconsistent with VIMS being determined by simple summation of the provocative stimuli. In the spiral motion condition, an atypical decrease in VIMS was observed during exposure, which was consistently preceded by a reduction in reported vection. It was hypothesised that the abstract nature as well as the unusual motion profile in the spiral motion condition may have rendered the stimulus increasingly ‘improbable’ and ultimately being disregarded, or ‘quarantined’, as an orientation cue by the central nervous system. The results are discussed in the context of methodological consequences for VIMS research and potential limitations of the use of abstract stimuli.

KW - simulator sickness

KW - dual-axis motion

KW - ecological validity

KW - quarantining

U2 - 10.1016/j.displa.2011.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.displa.2011.02.005

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 175

EP - 180

JO - Displays

JF - Displays

SN - 0141-9382

IS - 4

ER -