Abstract
Disengagement from violent extremism and reintegration into mainstream society have been the focus of significant research over the last 15 years. However, programs to facilitate or bring about violent extremist disengagement and reintegration are under-researched, largely as a result of the opacity of these programs and difficulties in access. Understanding how and why programs work or do not work is also impeded by conceptual confusion, and by four specific problems which have been discussed in the relevant literature: insufficient attention to the context and environment surrounding programmatic interventions, lack of clarity over their intended outcomes, lack of specificity in responses, and simplistic models of causation. The paper endorses previous studies recommending the use of realist evaluation to understand disengagement and reintegration interventions, and proposes a conceptual framework derived from an extensive review of the relevant literature to support planning, design and evaluation of interventions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 419-438 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Studies in Conflict & Terrorism |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 19 Jul 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
© 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited
Funding
The research for this article was largely conducted as part of a Jennings Randolph Senior Fellowship at the United States Institute for Peace (USIP). The author wishes to thank Leanne Erdberg Steadman and Chris Bosley at USIP for their support and review of this paper, as well as a panel of international experts on violent extremist disengagement who contributed to a workshop facilitated by USIP in March 2021. The author would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers who contributed valuable suggestions on an earlier version of this paper.
| Funders |
|---|
| United States Institute of Peace |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Themes
- Security and Resilience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Violent Extremist Disengagement and Reintegration: A Framework for Planning, Design and Evaluation of Programmatic Interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS