Utility of accelerometers to measure physical activity in children attending an obesity treatment intervention

Wendy Robertson, Sarah Stewart-Brown, Elizabeth Horton, Michelle Oldfield, Margaret Thorogood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)
42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives. To investigate the use of accelerometers to monitor change in physical activity in a childhood obesity treatment intervention. Methods. 28 children aged 7-13 taking part in "Families for Health" were asked to wear an accelerometer (Actigraph) for 7-days, and complete an accompanying activity diary, at baseline, 3-months and 9-months. Interviews with 12 parents asked about research measurements. Results. Over 90% of children provided 4 days of accelerometer data, and around half of children provided 7 days. Adequately completed diaries were collected from 60% of children. Children partake in a wide range of physical activity which uniaxial monitors may undermonitor (cycling, nonmotorised scootering) or overmonitor (trampolining). Two different cutoffs (4 METS or 3200 counts·min(-1)) for minutes spent in moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) yielded very different results, although reached the same conclusion regarding a lack of change in MVPA after the intervention. Some children were unwilling to wear accelerometers at school and during sport because they felt they put them at risk of stigma and bullying. Conclusion. Accelerometers are acceptable to a majority of children, although their use at school is problematic for some, but they may underestimate children's physical activity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number398918
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Obesity
Volume2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Pediatric Obesity
Exercise
Therapeutics
Bullying
Family Health
Sports
Parents
Interviews
Research

Cite this

Utility of accelerometers to measure physical activity in children attending an obesity treatment intervention. / Robertson, Wendy; Stewart-Brown, Sarah; Horton, Elizabeth; Oldfield, Michelle; Thorogood, Margaret.

In: Journal of Obesity, Vol. 2011, 398918, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Robertson, Wendy ; Stewart-Brown, Sarah ; Horton, Elizabeth ; Oldfield, Michelle ; Thorogood, Margaret. / Utility of accelerometers to measure physical activity in children attending an obesity treatment intervention. In: Journal of Obesity. 2011 ; Vol. 2011.
@article{e2567a5cc2134fc39d20a1126257b96b,
title = "Utility of accelerometers to measure physical activity in children attending an obesity treatment intervention",
abstract = "Objectives. To investigate the use of accelerometers to monitor change in physical activity in a childhood obesity treatment intervention. Methods. 28 children aged 7-13 taking part in {"}Families for Health{"} were asked to wear an accelerometer (Actigraph) for 7-days, and complete an accompanying activity diary, at baseline, 3-months and 9-months. Interviews with 12 parents asked about research measurements. Results. Over 90{\%} of children provided 4 days of accelerometer data, and around half of children provided 7 days. Adequately completed diaries were collected from 60{\%} of children. Children partake in a wide range of physical activity which uniaxial monitors may undermonitor (cycling, nonmotorised scootering) or overmonitor (trampolining). Two different cutoffs (4 METS or 3200 counts·min(-1)) for minutes spent in moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) yielded very different results, although reached the same conclusion regarding a lack of change in MVPA after the intervention. Some children were unwilling to wear accelerometers at school and during sport because they felt they put them at risk of stigma and bullying. Conclusion. Accelerometers are acceptable to a majority of children, although their use at school is problematic for some, but they may underestimate children's physical activity.",
author = "Wendy Robertson and Sarah Stewart-Brown and Elizabeth Horton and Michelle Oldfield and Margaret Thorogood",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1155/2011/398918",
language = "English",
volume = "2011",
journal = "Journal of Obesity",
issn = "2090-0708",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of accelerometers to measure physical activity in children attending an obesity treatment intervention

AU - Robertson, Wendy

AU - Stewart-Brown, Sarah

AU - Horton, Elizabeth

AU - Oldfield, Michelle

AU - Thorogood, Margaret

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Objectives. To investigate the use of accelerometers to monitor change in physical activity in a childhood obesity treatment intervention. Methods. 28 children aged 7-13 taking part in "Families for Health" were asked to wear an accelerometer (Actigraph) for 7-days, and complete an accompanying activity diary, at baseline, 3-months and 9-months. Interviews with 12 parents asked about research measurements. Results. Over 90% of children provided 4 days of accelerometer data, and around half of children provided 7 days. Adequately completed diaries were collected from 60% of children. Children partake in a wide range of physical activity which uniaxial monitors may undermonitor (cycling, nonmotorised scootering) or overmonitor (trampolining). Two different cutoffs (4 METS or 3200 counts·min(-1)) for minutes spent in moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) yielded very different results, although reached the same conclusion regarding a lack of change in MVPA after the intervention. Some children were unwilling to wear accelerometers at school and during sport because they felt they put them at risk of stigma and bullying. Conclusion. Accelerometers are acceptable to a majority of children, although their use at school is problematic for some, but they may underestimate children's physical activity.

AB - Objectives. To investigate the use of accelerometers to monitor change in physical activity in a childhood obesity treatment intervention. Methods. 28 children aged 7-13 taking part in "Families for Health" were asked to wear an accelerometer (Actigraph) for 7-days, and complete an accompanying activity diary, at baseline, 3-months and 9-months. Interviews with 12 parents asked about research measurements. Results. Over 90% of children provided 4 days of accelerometer data, and around half of children provided 7 days. Adequately completed diaries were collected from 60% of children. Children partake in a wide range of physical activity which uniaxial monitors may undermonitor (cycling, nonmotorised scootering) or overmonitor (trampolining). Two different cutoffs (4 METS or 3200 counts·min(-1)) for minutes spent in moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) yielded very different results, although reached the same conclusion regarding a lack of change in MVPA after the intervention. Some children were unwilling to wear accelerometers at school and during sport because they felt they put them at risk of stigma and bullying. Conclusion. Accelerometers are acceptable to a majority of children, although their use at school is problematic for some, but they may underestimate children's physical activity.

U2 - 10.1155/2011/398918

DO - 10.1155/2011/398918

M3 - Article

VL - 2011

JO - Journal of Obesity

JF - Journal of Obesity

SN - 2090-0708

M1 - 398918

ER -