Using offender crime scene behavior to link stranger sexual assaults: A comparison of three statistical approaches

Matthew Tonkin, Tom Pakkanen, Jukka Siren, Craig Bennell, Jessica Woodhams, Amy Burrell, Hanne Imre, Jan M. Winter, Eva Lam, Gert Jan ten Brinke, Mark Webb, Gerard Labuschagne, Leah Ashmore-Hills, Jasper van der Kemp, Sami Lipponen, Lee Rainbow, Gabrielle Salfati, Pekka Santtila

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the utility of different statistical methods in differentiating sexual crimes committed by the same person from sexual crimes committed by different persons.
Methods: Logistic regression, iterative classification tree (ICT), and Bayesian analysis were applied to a dataset of 3,364 solved, unsolved, serial, and apparent one-off sexual assaults committed in five countries. Receiver
Operating Characteristic analysis was used to compare the statistical approaches.
Results: All approaches achieved statistically significant levels of discrimination accuracy. Two out of three Bayesian methods achieved a statistically higher level of accuracy (Areas Under the Curve [AUC] =0.89 [Bayesian coding method 1]; AUC =0.91 [Bayesian coding method 3]) than ICT analysis (AUC =0.88), logistic
regression (AUC= 0.87), and Bayesian coding method 2 (AUC =0.86).
Conclusions: The ability to capture/utilize between-offender differences in behavioral consistency appear to be of benefit when linking sexual offenses. Statistical approaches that utilize individual offender behaviors when
generating crime linkage predictions may be preferable to approaches that rely on a single summary score of behavioral similarity. Crime linkage decision-support tools should incorporate a range of statistical methods and
future research must compare these methods in terms of accuracy, usability, and suitability for practice.

Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Criminal Justice. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Criminal Justice, [50, (2017)] DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.002

© 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-28
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Criminal Justice
Volume50
Early online date18 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Fingerprint

Bayes Theorem
Crime
assault
Area Under Curve
offender
offense
Criminal Law
coding
Publications
statistical method
justice
Peer Review
Aptitude
formatting
sexual offense
Licensure
human being
Quality Control
quality control
peer review

Keywords

  • Crime linkage
  • Comparative case analysis
  • Bayesian analysis
  • Logistic regression
  • Classification tree analysis
  • Stranger sexual assault

Cite this

Using offender crime scene behavior to link stranger sexual assaults : A comparison of three statistical approaches. / Tonkin, Matthew; Pakkanen, Tom; Siren, Jukka; Bennell, Craig; Woodhams, Jessica; Burrell, Amy; Imre, Hanne; Winter, Jan M.; Lam, Eva; ten Brinke, Gert Jan; Webb, Mark; Labuschagne, Gerard; Ashmore-Hills, Leah; van der Kemp, Jasper; Lipponen, Sami; Rainbow, Lee; Salfati, Gabrielle; Santtila, Pekka.

In: Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 50, 05.2017, p. 19-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tonkin, M, Pakkanen, T, Siren, J, Bennell, C, Woodhams, J, Burrell, A, Imre, H, Winter, JM, Lam, E, ten Brinke, GJ, Webb, M, Labuschagne, G, Ashmore-Hills, L, van der Kemp, J, Lipponen, S, Rainbow, L, Salfati, G & Santtila, P 2017, 'Using offender crime scene behavior to link stranger sexual assaults: A comparison of three statistical approaches' Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 50, pp. 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.002
Tonkin, Matthew ; Pakkanen, Tom ; Siren, Jukka ; Bennell, Craig ; Woodhams, Jessica ; Burrell, Amy ; Imre, Hanne ; Winter, Jan M. ; Lam, Eva ; ten Brinke, Gert Jan ; Webb, Mark ; Labuschagne, Gerard ; Ashmore-Hills, Leah ; van der Kemp, Jasper ; Lipponen, Sami ; Rainbow, Lee ; Salfati, Gabrielle ; Santtila, Pekka. / Using offender crime scene behavior to link stranger sexual assaults : A comparison of three statistical approaches. In: Journal of Criminal Justice. 2017 ; Vol. 50. pp. 19-28.
@article{40f4aa7b428a4a859362d31cf4cb4ae3,
title = "Using offender crime scene behavior to link stranger sexual assaults: A comparison of three statistical approaches",
abstract = "Purpose: This study compared the utility of different statistical methods in differentiating sexual crimes committed by the same person from sexual crimes committed by different persons.Methods: Logistic regression, iterative classification tree (ICT), and Bayesian analysis were applied to a dataset of 3,364 solved, unsolved, serial, and apparent one-off sexual assaults committed in five countries. ReceiverOperating Characteristic analysis was used to compare the statistical approaches.Results: All approaches achieved statistically significant levels of discrimination accuracy. Two out of three Bayesian methods achieved a statistically higher level of accuracy (Areas Under the Curve [AUC] =0.89 [Bayesian coding method 1]; AUC =0.91 [Bayesian coding method 3]) than ICT analysis (AUC =0.88), logisticregression (AUC= 0.87), and Bayesian coding method 2 (AUC =0.86).Conclusions: The ability to capture/utilize between-offender differences in behavioral consistency appear to be of benefit when linking sexual offenses. Statistical approaches that utilize individual offender behaviors whengenerating crime linkage predictions may be preferable to approaches that rely on a single summary score of behavioral similarity. Crime linkage decision-support tools should incorporate a range of statistical methods andfuture research must compare these methods in terms of accuracy, usability, and suitability for practice.Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Criminal Justice. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Criminal Justice, [50, (2017)] DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.002{\circledC} 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
keywords = "Crime linkage, Comparative case analysis, Bayesian analysis, Logistic regression, Classification tree analysis, Stranger sexual assault",
author = "Matthew Tonkin and Tom Pakkanen and Jukka Siren and Craig Bennell and Jessica Woodhams and Amy Burrell and Hanne Imre and Winter, {Jan M.} and Eva Lam and {ten Brinke}, {Gert Jan} and Mark Webb and Gerard Labuschagne and Leah Ashmore-Hills and {van der Kemp}, Jasper and Sami Lipponen and Lee Rainbow and Gabrielle Salfati and Pekka Santtila",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.002",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "19--28",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "0047-2352",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using offender crime scene behavior to link stranger sexual assaults

T2 - A comparison of three statistical approaches

AU - Tonkin, Matthew

AU - Pakkanen, Tom

AU - Siren, Jukka

AU - Bennell, Craig

AU - Woodhams, Jessica

AU - Burrell, Amy

AU - Imre, Hanne

AU - Winter, Jan M.

AU - Lam, Eva

AU - ten Brinke, Gert Jan

AU - Webb, Mark

AU - Labuschagne, Gerard

AU - Ashmore-Hills, Leah

AU - van der Kemp, Jasper

AU - Lipponen, Sami

AU - Rainbow, Lee

AU - Salfati, Gabrielle

AU - Santtila, Pekka

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - Purpose: This study compared the utility of different statistical methods in differentiating sexual crimes committed by the same person from sexual crimes committed by different persons.Methods: Logistic regression, iterative classification tree (ICT), and Bayesian analysis were applied to a dataset of 3,364 solved, unsolved, serial, and apparent one-off sexual assaults committed in five countries. ReceiverOperating Characteristic analysis was used to compare the statistical approaches.Results: All approaches achieved statistically significant levels of discrimination accuracy. Two out of three Bayesian methods achieved a statistically higher level of accuracy (Areas Under the Curve [AUC] =0.89 [Bayesian coding method 1]; AUC =0.91 [Bayesian coding method 3]) than ICT analysis (AUC =0.88), logisticregression (AUC= 0.87), and Bayesian coding method 2 (AUC =0.86).Conclusions: The ability to capture/utilize between-offender differences in behavioral consistency appear to be of benefit when linking sexual offenses. Statistical approaches that utilize individual offender behaviors whengenerating crime linkage predictions may be preferable to approaches that rely on a single summary score of behavioral similarity. Crime linkage decision-support tools should incorporate a range of statistical methods andfuture research must compare these methods in terms of accuracy, usability, and suitability for practice.Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Criminal Justice. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Criminal Justice, [50, (2017)] DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.002© 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

AB - Purpose: This study compared the utility of different statistical methods in differentiating sexual crimes committed by the same person from sexual crimes committed by different persons.Methods: Logistic regression, iterative classification tree (ICT), and Bayesian analysis were applied to a dataset of 3,364 solved, unsolved, serial, and apparent one-off sexual assaults committed in five countries. ReceiverOperating Characteristic analysis was used to compare the statistical approaches.Results: All approaches achieved statistically significant levels of discrimination accuracy. Two out of three Bayesian methods achieved a statistically higher level of accuracy (Areas Under the Curve [AUC] =0.89 [Bayesian coding method 1]; AUC =0.91 [Bayesian coding method 3]) than ICT analysis (AUC =0.88), logisticregression (AUC= 0.87), and Bayesian coding method 2 (AUC =0.86).Conclusions: The ability to capture/utilize between-offender differences in behavioral consistency appear to be of benefit when linking sexual offenses. Statistical approaches that utilize individual offender behaviors whengenerating crime linkage predictions may be preferable to approaches that rely on a single summary score of behavioral similarity. Crime linkage decision-support tools should incorporate a range of statistical methods andfuture research must compare these methods in terms of accuracy, usability, and suitability for practice.Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Criminal Justice. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Criminal Justice, [50, (2017)] DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.002© 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

KW - Crime linkage

KW - Comparative case analysis

KW - Bayesian analysis

KW - Logistic regression

KW - Classification tree analysis

KW - Stranger sexual assault

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.002

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 19

EP - 28

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0047-2352

ER -