Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) is based upon Reason's organizational model of human error which suggests that there is a 'one to many' mapping of condition tokens (HFACS level 2 psychological precursors) to unsafe act tokens (HFACS level 1 error and violations). Using accident data derived from 523 military aircraft accidents, the relationship between HFACS level 2 preconditions and level 1 unsafe acts was modelled using an artificial neural network (NN). This allowed an empirical model to be developed congruent with the underlying theory of HFACS. The NN solution produced an average overall classification rate of ca. 74% for all unsafe acts from information derived from their level 2 preconditions. However, the correct classification rate was superior for decision- and skill-based errors, than for perceptual errors and violations. Practitioner Summary: A model to predict unsafe acts (HFACS level 1) from their preconditions (HFACS level 2) was developed from the analysis of 523 military aircraft accidents using an artificial NN. The results could correctly predict approximately 74% of errors.
Bibliographical noteThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics on 18 Nov 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00140139.2017.1407441
- Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)
- Neural Networks
- accident analysis
- human error
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Human Factors and Ergonomics
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Using Neural Networks to predict HFACS unsafe acts from the pre-conditions of unsafe acts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Automotive Engineering - Professor of Human Factors
Person: Teaching and Research