Abstract
This paper reviews the concepts and definitions related to elastic follow-up, Z, together with its potential use in stress classification. Based on the principles governing benchmark multiple bar structures elastic follow-up (EFU) is quantified. Local nonlinearities arising within a structure influence elastic follow-up. These include variations in the geometry of structure, its material properties, effects of plasticity and creep, structural discontinuities and boundary conditions. Elastic follow-up is shown to be simple to evaluate, is physically meaningful (as it relates strain accumulation in the structure to its cause) and is useful in design practice. In this generalised definition Z = 1 indicates no follow-up and represents a fully displacement controlled situation. In contrast Z = ∞ represents the extreme case of fully load controlled situation. Presence of mixed boundary conditions is interpreted as 1 < Z < ∞. A methodology that overcomes the singularity problem of cracked structure to determine Z is then proposed. The distinctive characteristic of the proposed approach is that it takes account of situations where the structure contains defects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 523-531 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP |
| Volume | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
| Event | ASME 2008 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference - Chicago, United States Duration: 27 Jul 2008 → 31 Jul 2008 |
Bibliographical note
This paper is not available in Pure.ISBN: 978-0-7918-4826-5
Keywords
- Plasticity
- Creep
- Product quality
- Stress
- Material properties
- Design
- , Boundary-value problems
- Displacement
- Geometry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Use of elastic follow-up in integrity assessment of structures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS