Abstract
This paper introduces an innovative framework for decision making by individuals with inconsistent preferences. Practices, associations of individuals with a preference set shared by its members, provide context and unify preferences across an economy so that decision-makers are situated in social and economic structures. Our framework models the time evolution of certain attributes, emerging from the practice framework, that govern individuals’ decisions and their intertemporal variation. A novel feature is that preferences are able to rank other preference sets without the need to aggregate them. Instead, the selection of a preference set is treated as a decision in its own right. Our framework explains decision making paradoxes such as the disposition effect and agency cost considerations that are frequently encountered in the behavioural finance and economics literature.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3–26 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Annals of Operations Research |
Volume | 282 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
Early online date | 31 Mar 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2019 |
Bibliographical note
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2836-9Keywords
- Intertemporal choice
- Time-inconsistent preferences
- Multiple selves
- Disposition effect
- Decision theory
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Management Science and Operations Research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding time-inconsistent heterogeneous preferences in economics and finance: A practice theory approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Panagiotis Andrikopoulos
- Research Centre for Financial & Corporate Integrity - Centre Director
Person: Professional Services