Understanding the role of patient and public involvement in renal dietetic research

Andrew Morris, Deborah Biggerstaff, Nithya Krishnan, Deborah Lycett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The objective was to consult patients on a proposed recruitment strategy to a patient and public involvement exercise. We wanted to explore the reasoning and willingness of patients to become co-researchers within a grant application. Eighteen people using the renal health service informed the consultation by action research so that their experiences could be used to guide the overall methodology. Twelve people took part in semi-structured interviews. NVIVO 10 and Framework Analysis were used to interpret emerging themes from the data. The recruitment strategy, informed by research expertise, became an experience-based expert design. The design took into account the limitations of attendance, the informational and physical needs of these service users. Service users wanted to share their experiences with people who would listen and were in a position to help make the changes. This gave them a sense of purpose and autonomy in their treatment and helped them cope with living with renal disease in society. However, feelings of doubt as to whether they could personally ‘make a difference’ as a co-researcher, were common. Consulting service users enabled the research team to recruit more people to interviews to explore motivation considering the unique personal and social needs of this service user group. Service users may need additional and continued support if they are to successfully take part in a clinical study research advisory group.
Original languageEnglish
Article number5
Pages (from-to)23-32
Number of pages10
JournalPatient experience journal
Volume4
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dietetics
Kidney
Research
Research Personnel
Interviews
Organized Financing
Health Services Research
Social Work
Health Services
Motivation
Emotions
Referral and Consultation
Exercise
Therapeutics

Cite this

Understanding the role of patient and public involvement in renal dietetic research. / Morris, Andrew; Biggerstaff, Deborah; Krishnan, Nithya; Lycett, Deborah.

In: Patient experience journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, 5, 2017, p. 23-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morris, Andrew ; Biggerstaff, Deborah ; Krishnan, Nithya ; Lycett, Deborah. / Understanding the role of patient and public involvement in renal dietetic research. In: Patient experience journal. 2017 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 23-32.
@article{f651eb35ee91468f92ca017baa5fd97f,
title = "Understanding the role of patient and public involvement in renal dietetic research",
abstract = "The objective was to consult patients on a proposed recruitment strategy to a patient and public involvement exercise. We wanted to explore the reasoning and willingness of patients to become co-researchers within a grant application. Eighteen people using the renal health service informed the consultation by action research so that their experiences could be used to guide the overall methodology. Twelve people took part in semi-structured interviews. NVIVO 10 and Framework Analysis were used to interpret emerging themes from the data. The recruitment strategy, informed by research expertise, became an experience-based expert design. The design took into account the limitations of attendance, the informational and physical needs of these service users. Service users wanted to share their experiences with people who would listen and were in a position to help make the changes. This gave them a sense of purpose and autonomy in their treatment and helped them cope with living with renal disease in society. However, feelings of doubt as to whether they could personally ‘make a difference’ as a co-researcher, were common. Consulting service users enabled the research team to recruit more people to interviews to explore motivation considering the unique personal and social needs of this service user group. Service users may need additional and continued support if they are to successfully take part in a clinical study research advisory group.",
author = "Andrew Morris and Deborah Biggerstaff and Nithya Krishnan and Deborah Lycett",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "23--32",
journal = "Patient experience journal",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the role of patient and public involvement in renal dietetic research

AU - Morris, Andrew

AU - Biggerstaff, Deborah

AU - Krishnan, Nithya

AU - Lycett, Deborah

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The objective was to consult patients on a proposed recruitment strategy to a patient and public involvement exercise. We wanted to explore the reasoning and willingness of patients to become co-researchers within a grant application. Eighteen people using the renal health service informed the consultation by action research so that their experiences could be used to guide the overall methodology. Twelve people took part in semi-structured interviews. NVIVO 10 and Framework Analysis were used to interpret emerging themes from the data. The recruitment strategy, informed by research expertise, became an experience-based expert design. The design took into account the limitations of attendance, the informational and physical needs of these service users. Service users wanted to share their experiences with people who would listen and were in a position to help make the changes. This gave them a sense of purpose and autonomy in their treatment and helped them cope with living with renal disease in society. However, feelings of doubt as to whether they could personally ‘make a difference’ as a co-researcher, were common. Consulting service users enabled the research team to recruit more people to interviews to explore motivation considering the unique personal and social needs of this service user group. Service users may need additional and continued support if they are to successfully take part in a clinical study research advisory group.

AB - The objective was to consult patients on a proposed recruitment strategy to a patient and public involvement exercise. We wanted to explore the reasoning and willingness of patients to become co-researchers within a grant application. Eighteen people using the renal health service informed the consultation by action research so that their experiences could be used to guide the overall methodology. Twelve people took part in semi-structured interviews. NVIVO 10 and Framework Analysis were used to interpret emerging themes from the data. The recruitment strategy, informed by research expertise, became an experience-based expert design. The design took into account the limitations of attendance, the informational and physical needs of these service users. Service users wanted to share their experiences with people who would listen and were in a position to help make the changes. This gave them a sense of purpose and autonomy in their treatment and helped them cope with living with renal disease in society. However, feelings of doubt as to whether they could personally ‘make a difference’ as a co-researcher, were common. Consulting service users enabled the research team to recruit more people to interviews to explore motivation considering the unique personal and social needs of this service user group. Service users may need additional and continued support if they are to successfully take part in a clinical study research advisory group.

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 23

EP - 32

JO - Patient experience journal

JF - Patient experience journal

IS - 2

M1 - 5

ER -