Trust into mistrust: the uncertain marriage between public and private sector practice for middle managers in education

Carol Thompson, Peter Wolstencroft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The role of the middle manager has proved to be a difficult one to define due to the fluid nature of the tasks performed and the heterogeneity of understanding that exists for the term. This is further complicated by the differences associated with the context in which individual manager’s work. This research, which explores the drive towards neo-liberalism and the subsequent adoption of leadership and management practice from the private sector, makes a comparison between the roles of managers in English education with those in other settings. Using a questionnaire with 252 responses and interviews with 6 managers in the private and public sector, the role of middle managers was compared to identify the similarities and differences between organisations driven by social policy as opposed to profit. Participants surveyed were based in primary, secondary and further education and the interview respondents were employed in non-education contexts. The findings suggest that the initial reforms, which required higher levels of accountability through the introduction of key performance indicators, appear to be fully embedded within the education manager’s role and there is a high degree of convergence in relation to the expectation of managers at this level in all the settings. The findings also highlighted a fundamental difference in relation to how middle managers were expected to carry out their duties, the autonomy they had to do so and the authority that was bestowed upon them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-230
Number of pages18
JournalResearch in Post-Compulsory Education
Volume23
Issue number2
Early online date8 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

private sector
public sector
marriage
manager
education
further education
primary education
interview
secondary education
neoliberalism
profit
autonomy
leadership
reform
responsibility
questionnaire
management
performance

Keywords

  • Middle management
  • private sector
  • managerialism
  • further education
  • accountability
  • autonomy

Cite this

Trust into mistrust: the uncertain marriage between public and private sector practice for middle managers in education. / Thompson, Carol; Wolstencroft, Peter.

In: Research in Post-Compulsory Education, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2018, p. 213-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a3a53a2c450f4e3f8cc1c50e175d3323,
title = "Trust into mistrust: the uncertain marriage between public and private sector practice for middle managers in education",
abstract = "The role of the middle manager has proved to be a difficult one to define due to the fluid nature of the tasks performed and the heterogeneity of understanding that exists for the term. This is further complicated by the differences associated with the context in which individual manager’s work. This research, which explores the drive towards neo-liberalism and the subsequent adoption of leadership and management practice from the private sector, makes a comparison between the roles of managers in English education with those in other settings. Using a questionnaire with 252 responses and interviews with 6 managers in the private and public sector, the role of middle managers was compared to identify the similarities and differences between organisations driven by social policy as opposed to profit. Participants surveyed were based in primary, secondary and further education and the interview respondents were employed in non-education contexts. The findings suggest that the initial reforms, which required higher levels of accountability through the introduction of key performance indicators, appear to be fully embedded within the education manager’s role and there is a high degree of convergence in relation to the expectation of managers at this level in all the settings. The findings also highlighted a fundamental difference in relation to how middle managers were expected to carry out their duties, the autonomy they had to do so and the authority that was bestowed upon them.",
keywords = "Middle management, private sector, managerialism, further education, accountability, autonomy",
author = "Carol Thompson and Peter Wolstencroft",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/13596748.2018.1444372",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "213--230",
journal = "Research in Post-Compulsory Education",
issn = "1359-6748",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust into mistrust: the uncertain marriage between public and private sector practice for middle managers in education

AU - Thompson, Carol

AU - Wolstencroft, Peter

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The role of the middle manager has proved to be a difficult one to define due to the fluid nature of the tasks performed and the heterogeneity of understanding that exists for the term. This is further complicated by the differences associated with the context in which individual manager’s work. This research, which explores the drive towards neo-liberalism and the subsequent adoption of leadership and management practice from the private sector, makes a comparison between the roles of managers in English education with those in other settings. Using a questionnaire with 252 responses and interviews with 6 managers in the private and public sector, the role of middle managers was compared to identify the similarities and differences between organisations driven by social policy as opposed to profit. Participants surveyed were based in primary, secondary and further education and the interview respondents were employed in non-education contexts. The findings suggest that the initial reforms, which required higher levels of accountability through the introduction of key performance indicators, appear to be fully embedded within the education manager’s role and there is a high degree of convergence in relation to the expectation of managers at this level in all the settings. The findings also highlighted a fundamental difference in relation to how middle managers were expected to carry out their duties, the autonomy they had to do so and the authority that was bestowed upon them.

AB - The role of the middle manager has proved to be a difficult one to define due to the fluid nature of the tasks performed and the heterogeneity of understanding that exists for the term. This is further complicated by the differences associated with the context in which individual manager’s work. This research, which explores the drive towards neo-liberalism and the subsequent adoption of leadership and management practice from the private sector, makes a comparison between the roles of managers in English education with those in other settings. Using a questionnaire with 252 responses and interviews with 6 managers in the private and public sector, the role of middle managers was compared to identify the similarities and differences between organisations driven by social policy as opposed to profit. Participants surveyed were based in primary, secondary and further education and the interview respondents were employed in non-education contexts. The findings suggest that the initial reforms, which required higher levels of accountability through the introduction of key performance indicators, appear to be fully embedded within the education manager’s role and there is a high degree of convergence in relation to the expectation of managers at this level in all the settings. The findings also highlighted a fundamental difference in relation to how middle managers were expected to carry out their duties, the autonomy they had to do so and the authority that was bestowed upon them.

KW - Middle management

KW - private sector

KW - managerialism

KW - further education

KW - accountability

KW - autonomy

U2 - 10.1080/13596748.2018.1444372

DO - 10.1080/13596748.2018.1444372

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 213

EP - 230

JO - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

JF - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

SN - 1359-6748

IS - 2

ER -