Trust, inequality and the Fire Service

Chris Hastie

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

Abstract

There is evidence from across the English speaking world that not everyone is at equal risk from fire. Studies have consistently identified factors associated with lower socio-economic status as markers of a higher risk of suffering loss as a result of an accidental fire. Preliminary analysis of incident data from a large urban Fire and Rescue Service (FRS) in England appears consistent with these past studies, demonstrating clear links between the rate of fire incidence and neighbourhood deprivation, particularly employment and income deprivation. Whilst fire safety interventions in recent times have been successful in dramatically reducing the incidence of accidental fire, a fundamental inequality in the distribution of fires persists.
Having outlined the analysis of FRS data, this paper moves on to explore the idea that one reason for this inequality may lie in the nature of the relationship between the FRS and the communities it serves. It is argued that many deprived communities have developed not merely low trust, but active distrust of any agency that is associated with the state. Despite the popular perception that fire fighters are held in universally high regard, this distrust extends to the FRS and may hamper efforts to communicate the fire safety message. A deeper understanding of the nature of this relationship, and the effect that the culture and structure of the FRS have on the relationship, is essential if the inequality of service outcomes is to be addressed.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 29 Mar 2014
EventSocial Relations, Transformation and Trust Conference - Coventry, United Kingdom
Duration: 28 Mar 201429 Mar 2014

Conference

ConferenceSocial Relations, Transformation and Trust Conference
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityCoventry
Period28/03/1429/03/14

Fingerprint

rescue services
deprivation
incidence
community
speaking
incident
income
evidence
economics

Cite this

Hastie, C. (2014). Trust, inequality and the Fire Service. Abstract from Social Relations, Transformation and Trust Conference, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Trust, inequality and the Fire Service. / Hastie, Chris.

2014. Abstract from Social Relations, Transformation and Trust Conference, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

Hastie, C 2014, 'Trust, inequality and the Fire Service' Social Relations, Transformation and Trust Conference, Coventry, United Kingdom, 28/03/14 - 29/03/14, .
Hastie C. Trust, inequality and the Fire Service. 2014. Abstract from Social Relations, Transformation and Trust Conference, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Hastie, Chris. / Trust, inequality and the Fire Service. Abstract from Social Relations, Transformation and Trust Conference, Coventry, United Kingdom.
@conference{0e6a43fc0c184e1b9c1823dcd05d0f2c,
title = "Trust, inequality and the Fire Service",
abstract = "There is evidence from across the English speaking world that not everyone is at equal risk from fire. Studies have consistently identified factors associated with lower socio-economic status as markers of a higher risk of suffering loss as a result of an accidental fire. Preliminary analysis of incident data from a large urban Fire and Rescue Service (FRS) in England appears consistent with these past studies, demonstrating clear links between the rate of fire incidence and neighbourhood deprivation, particularly employment and income deprivation. Whilst fire safety interventions in recent times have been successful in dramatically reducing the incidence of accidental fire, a fundamental inequality in the distribution of fires persists.Having outlined the analysis of FRS data, this paper moves on to explore the idea that one reason for this inequality may lie in the nature of the relationship between the FRS and the communities it serves. It is argued that many deprived communities have developed not merely low trust, but active distrust of any agency that is associated with the state. Despite the popular perception that fire fighters are held in universally high regard, this distrust extends to the FRS and may hamper efforts to communicate the fire safety message. A deeper understanding of the nature of this relationship, and the effect that the culture and structure of the FRS have on the relationship, is essential if the inequality of service outcomes is to be addressed.",
author = "Chris Hastie",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "29",
language = "English",
note = "Social Relations, Transformation and Trust Conference ; Conference date: 28-03-2014 Through 29-03-2014",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Trust, inequality and the Fire Service

AU - Hastie, Chris

PY - 2014/3/29

Y1 - 2014/3/29

N2 - There is evidence from across the English speaking world that not everyone is at equal risk from fire. Studies have consistently identified factors associated with lower socio-economic status as markers of a higher risk of suffering loss as a result of an accidental fire. Preliminary analysis of incident data from a large urban Fire and Rescue Service (FRS) in England appears consistent with these past studies, demonstrating clear links between the rate of fire incidence and neighbourhood deprivation, particularly employment and income deprivation. Whilst fire safety interventions in recent times have been successful in dramatically reducing the incidence of accidental fire, a fundamental inequality in the distribution of fires persists.Having outlined the analysis of FRS data, this paper moves on to explore the idea that one reason for this inequality may lie in the nature of the relationship between the FRS and the communities it serves. It is argued that many deprived communities have developed not merely low trust, but active distrust of any agency that is associated with the state. Despite the popular perception that fire fighters are held in universally high regard, this distrust extends to the FRS and may hamper efforts to communicate the fire safety message. A deeper understanding of the nature of this relationship, and the effect that the culture and structure of the FRS have on the relationship, is essential if the inequality of service outcomes is to be addressed.

AB - There is evidence from across the English speaking world that not everyone is at equal risk from fire. Studies have consistently identified factors associated with lower socio-economic status as markers of a higher risk of suffering loss as a result of an accidental fire. Preliminary analysis of incident data from a large urban Fire and Rescue Service (FRS) in England appears consistent with these past studies, demonstrating clear links between the rate of fire incidence and neighbourhood deprivation, particularly employment and income deprivation. Whilst fire safety interventions in recent times have been successful in dramatically reducing the incidence of accidental fire, a fundamental inequality in the distribution of fires persists.Having outlined the analysis of FRS data, this paper moves on to explore the idea that one reason for this inequality may lie in the nature of the relationship between the FRS and the communities it serves. It is argued that many deprived communities have developed not merely low trust, but active distrust of any agency that is associated with the state. Despite the popular perception that fire fighters are held in universally high regard, this distrust extends to the FRS and may hamper efforts to communicate the fire safety message. A deeper understanding of the nature of this relationship, and the effect that the culture and structure of the FRS have on the relationship, is essential if the inequality of service outcomes is to be addressed.

M3 - Abstract

ER -