Transport energy futures: Exploring the geopolitical dimension

Michael B Charles, Hong To, Pat Gillett, Tania von der Heidt, Rob Kivits

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The future of road transport, being currently reliant on carbon-based liquid fuels, is largely unclear. Some advocate the necessity of single renewable energy paradigm, but its realization is potentially fraught with difficulty owing to technological challenges, existing sunk costs, and path dependencies associated with existing and emerging options. It could also result in disadvantageous outcomes to emerging economies. Another school of thought proposes that future road transport, even within single nations, will require multiple energy types, mainly because a single source will be insufficient to meet projected needs. A multiple paradigm has the potential to be expensive because several infrastructures have to be implemented simultaneously. This paper aims to assess both concepts by considering the largely neglected dimensions of resource location and regional geophysical attributes, in addition to national technical expertise, industry capacity and modal factors. Case studies from both the developed world (the European Union and Australia) and the developing world (sub-Saharan Africa and China) will assess the possibility of implementing a single transport energy paradigm versus a more pluralistic regime. The results will help to inform policy making and enable greater foresight with regard to making long-term transport infrastructure investment decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1142-1153
Number of pages12
JournalFutures
Volume43
Issue number10
Early online date29 Jul 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

road transport
infrastructure
paradigm
energy
policy making
road
European Union
developing world
renewable energy
liquid
industry
carbon
expertise
resource
cost
regime
China
economy
costs
resources

Cite this

Charles, M. B., To, H., Gillett, P., von der Heidt, T., & Kivits, R. (2011). Transport energy futures: Exploring the geopolitical dimension. Futures, 43(10), 1142-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.07.012

Transport energy futures : Exploring the geopolitical dimension. / Charles, Michael B; To, Hong; Gillett, Pat; von der Heidt, Tania; Kivits, Rob.

In: Futures, Vol. 43, No. 10, 12.2011, p. 1142-1153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Charles, MB, To, H, Gillett, P, von der Heidt, T & Kivits, R 2011, 'Transport energy futures: Exploring the geopolitical dimension' Futures, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1142-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.07.012
Charles, Michael B ; To, Hong ; Gillett, Pat ; von der Heidt, Tania ; Kivits, Rob. / Transport energy futures : Exploring the geopolitical dimension. In: Futures. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 10. pp. 1142-1153.
@article{12b493e8f9d746c1981d7f0172871616,
title = "Transport energy futures: Exploring the geopolitical dimension",
abstract = "The future of road transport, being currently reliant on carbon-based liquid fuels, is largely unclear. Some advocate the necessity of single renewable energy paradigm, but its realization is potentially fraught with difficulty owing to technological challenges, existing sunk costs, and path dependencies associated with existing and emerging options. It could also result in disadvantageous outcomes to emerging economies. Another school of thought proposes that future road transport, even within single nations, will require multiple energy types, mainly because a single source will be insufficient to meet projected needs. A multiple paradigm has the potential to be expensive because several infrastructures have to be implemented simultaneously. This paper aims to assess both concepts by considering the largely neglected dimensions of resource location and regional geophysical attributes, in addition to national technical expertise, industry capacity and modal factors. Case studies from both the developed world (the European Union and Australia) and the developing world (sub-Saharan Africa and China) will assess the possibility of implementing a single transport energy paradigm versus a more pluralistic regime. The results will help to inform policy making and enable greater foresight with regard to making long-term transport infrastructure investment decisions.",
author = "Charles, {Michael B} and Hong To and Pat Gillett and {von der Heidt}, Tania and Rob Kivits",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.futures.2011.07.012",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1142--1153",
journal = "Futures",
issn = "0016-3287",
publisher = "Pergamon Press Ltd.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transport energy futures

T2 - Exploring the geopolitical dimension

AU - Charles, Michael B

AU - To, Hong

AU - Gillett, Pat

AU - von der Heidt, Tania

AU - Kivits, Rob

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - The future of road transport, being currently reliant on carbon-based liquid fuels, is largely unclear. Some advocate the necessity of single renewable energy paradigm, but its realization is potentially fraught with difficulty owing to technological challenges, existing sunk costs, and path dependencies associated with existing and emerging options. It could also result in disadvantageous outcomes to emerging economies. Another school of thought proposes that future road transport, even within single nations, will require multiple energy types, mainly because a single source will be insufficient to meet projected needs. A multiple paradigm has the potential to be expensive because several infrastructures have to be implemented simultaneously. This paper aims to assess both concepts by considering the largely neglected dimensions of resource location and regional geophysical attributes, in addition to national technical expertise, industry capacity and modal factors. Case studies from both the developed world (the European Union and Australia) and the developing world (sub-Saharan Africa and China) will assess the possibility of implementing a single transport energy paradigm versus a more pluralistic regime. The results will help to inform policy making and enable greater foresight with regard to making long-term transport infrastructure investment decisions.

AB - The future of road transport, being currently reliant on carbon-based liquid fuels, is largely unclear. Some advocate the necessity of single renewable energy paradigm, but its realization is potentially fraught with difficulty owing to technological challenges, existing sunk costs, and path dependencies associated with existing and emerging options. It could also result in disadvantageous outcomes to emerging economies. Another school of thought proposes that future road transport, even within single nations, will require multiple energy types, mainly because a single source will be insufficient to meet projected needs. A multiple paradigm has the potential to be expensive because several infrastructures have to be implemented simultaneously. This paper aims to assess both concepts by considering the largely neglected dimensions of resource location and regional geophysical attributes, in addition to national technical expertise, industry capacity and modal factors. Case studies from both the developed world (the European Union and Australia) and the developing world (sub-Saharan Africa and China) will assess the possibility of implementing a single transport energy paradigm versus a more pluralistic regime. The results will help to inform policy making and enable greater foresight with regard to making long-term transport infrastructure investment decisions.

U2 - 10.1016/j.futures.2011.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.futures.2011.07.012

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1142

EP - 1153

JO - Futures

JF - Futures

SN - 0016-3287

IS - 10

ER -