Abstract
Abstract
Objective To examine transition times between long-term conditions (LTCs) and their associated determinants among childbearing women.
Design A population-based cohort study. We estimated median times to progress from 1 to 2, 2 to 3, 3 to 4 and 4 to ≥5 LTCs, stratified by ethnicity, socioeconomic status and region. 10-year risks of progression from first to second LTC were estimated by entry cohort (pre-2013 vs ≥2013) using Kaplan–Meier methods, with determinants assessed using Weibull survival models.
Setting English primary care records (CPRD Aurum and GOLD) and pregnancy registers.
Participants A total of 2 160 157 women with a first LTC diagnosis during reproductive years (ages 15–49) and at least one recorded pregnancy between 2003 and 2022.
Results Approximately 65% with one LTC progressed to develop two or more LTCs. The median time to develop additional LTCs decreased progressively: 5.58 years (from 1 to 2), 4.45 years (from 2 to 3), 3.89 years (from 3 to 4) and 3.68 years (from 4 to 5+). Women diagnosed with their first LTC from 2013 onwards transitioned to second LTC faster than those diagnosed before 2013 (χ² = 4260.55, p<0.001). Faster progression was observed among women from the most deprived backgrounds compared with the least deprived (TR 0.79, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.80). Compared with Southwest England, women in the Northwest, West Midlands and Southeast acquired additional LTCs more rapidly. Ethnic variations in the risk of progression were also observed in specific contexts. Furthermore, analysis of baseline condition-specific trajectories showed that women with an initial diagnosis of cardiomyopathy experienced the fastest transition to a subsequent LTC (median survival time (MST) 3.89 years; 95% CI 0.99 to 11.78). This was followed by women with coronary heart disease (MST 4.21 years; 95% CI 1.30 to 11.34), diabetes (MST 4.25 years; 95% CI 1.39 to 9.20) and anxiety (MST 4.29 years; 95% CI 1.46 to 10.12).
Conclusion LTC accumulation among childbearing women is driven by socioeconomic deprivation, ethnicity and regional disparities. Targeted interventions for high-risk groups, alongside efforts to address structural inequalities, may help slow this progression.
Objective To examine transition times between long-term conditions (LTCs) and their associated determinants among childbearing women.
Design A population-based cohort study. We estimated median times to progress from 1 to 2, 2 to 3, 3 to 4 and 4 to ≥5 LTCs, stratified by ethnicity, socioeconomic status and region. 10-year risks of progression from first to second LTC were estimated by entry cohort (pre-2013 vs ≥2013) using Kaplan–Meier methods, with determinants assessed using Weibull survival models.
Setting English primary care records (CPRD Aurum and GOLD) and pregnancy registers.
Participants A total of 2 160 157 women with a first LTC diagnosis during reproductive years (ages 15–49) and at least one recorded pregnancy between 2003 and 2022.
Results Approximately 65% with one LTC progressed to develop two or more LTCs. The median time to develop additional LTCs decreased progressively: 5.58 years (from 1 to 2), 4.45 years (from 2 to 3), 3.89 years (from 3 to 4) and 3.68 years (from 4 to 5+). Women diagnosed with their first LTC from 2013 onwards transitioned to second LTC faster than those diagnosed before 2013 (χ² = 4260.55, p<0.001). Faster progression was observed among women from the most deprived backgrounds compared with the least deprived (TR 0.79, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.80). Compared with Southwest England, women in the Northwest, West Midlands and Southeast acquired additional LTCs more rapidly. Ethnic variations in the risk of progression were also observed in specific contexts. Furthermore, analysis of baseline condition-specific trajectories showed that women with an initial diagnosis of cardiomyopathy experienced the fastest transition to a subsequent LTC (median survival time (MST) 3.89 years; 95% CI 0.99 to 11.78). This was followed by women with coronary heart disease (MST 4.21 years; 95% CI 1.30 to 11.34), diabetes (MST 4.25 years; 95% CI 1.39 to 9.20) and anxiety (MST 4.29 years; 95% CI 1.46 to 10.12).
Conclusion LTC accumulation among childbearing women is driven by socioeconomic deprivation, ethnicity and regional disparities. Targeted interventions for high-risk groups, alongside efforts to address structural inequalities, may help slow this progression.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Family Medicine and Community Health |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Mar 2026 |
Bibliographical note
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re- use permitted under CC BY- NC. No commercial re- use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY- NC 4.0) license, which
permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non- commercially,
and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is
properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use
is non- commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Funding
This research was funded by the Trailblazers Early-Career Researcher and Doctoral Studentship Partnering Scheme at Coventry University (Award No. 13771‑93) awarded to AA. The funder was not involved in the study’s design, data collection, analysis, interpretation or the preparation of this report.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Coventry University | 13771‑93 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Multiple Chronic Conditions
- Reproductive Health
- Reproductive Health Services
- Women's Health
- Women's Health Services
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Transition time between long-term conditions among childbearing women in England: a nationwide observational analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS