Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Trade Wins or Trade Wars: The Perceptions and Knowledge in the Free Trade Debate

  • Bogna Gawronska-Nowak
  • , Piotr Lis
  • , Joanna Konieczna-Sałamatin
    • University of Warsaw
    • Institute of Urban and Regional Development

    Research output: Book/ReportBookpeer-review

    Abstract

    This book tackles the disconnect between social perceptions and expert knowledge regarding trade policy decisions. Using a Polish language internet database, the authors shed light on areas that need to be addressed when considering the adoption of particular trade policies by applying content and statistical analysis to produce an easy to deploy measure of populism in digital media, the “Media Populism Ratio”.
    Defining a mismatch between social perception and expert knowledge may contribute to a better understanding of the controversies on free trade, as well as properly defining possible sources of populism and social conflicts – therefore also revealing some potential weaknesses in the trade policy implementation level which are at times neglected or underestimated. The book will be relevant to students and researchers interested in economic policy, economic narratives and cultural economics.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationLondon
    PublisherPalgrave Pivot, Cham
    Number of pages173
    ISBN (Electronic)978-3-030-76997-0
    ISBN (Print)978-3-030-76996-3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2021

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021. All rights reserved.

    Keywords

    • Free Trade Agreements
    • Populism Diffusion in Media
    • Social perception of protectionism
    • Trade Policy
    • Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)
    • Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Trade Wins or Trade Wars: The Perceptions and Knowledge in the Free Trade Debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this