Towards increased reliability by objectification of Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) of automated automotive systems

Siddartha Khastgir, Stewart Birrell, Gunwant Dhadyalla, Håkan Sivencrona, Paul Jennings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) in various domains like automotive, aviation, and process industry suffers from the issues of validity and reliability. While there has been an increasing appreciation of this subject, there have been limited approaches to overcome these issues. In the automotive domain, HARA is influenced by the ISO 26262 international standard which details functional safety of road vehicles. While ISO 26262 was a major step towards analysing hazards and risks, like other domains, it is also plagued by the issues of reliability. In this paper, the authors discuss the automotive HARA process. While exposing the reliability challenges of the HARA process detailed by the standard, the authors present an approach to overcome the reliability issues. The approach is obtained by creating a rule-set for automotive HARA to determine the Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) by parametrizing the individual components of an automotive HARA, i.e., severity, exposure and controllability. The initial rule-set was put to test by conducting a workshop involving international functional safety experts as participants in an experiment where rules were provided for severity and controllability ratings. Based on the qualitative results of the experiments, the rule-set was re-calibrated. The proposed HARA approach by the creation of a rule-set demonstrated reduction in variation. However, the caveat lies in the fact that the rule-set needs to be exhaustive or sufficiently explained in order to avoid any degree of subjective interpretation which is a source of variation and unreliability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-177
Number of pages12
JournalSafety Science
Volume99
Issue number(Part B)
Early online date13 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

objectification
Risk assessment
risk assessment
Hazards
Safety
Controllability
Aviation
experiment
air traffic
Reproducibility of Results
integrity
Industry
rating
road
expert
Experiments
Education
interpretation
industry

Keywords

  • Functional safety
  • HARA
  • Hazard
  • ISO 26262
  • Reliability

Cite this

Towards increased reliability by objectification of Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) of automated automotive systems. / Khastgir, Siddartha; Birrell, Stewart; Dhadyalla, Gunwant; Sivencrona, Håkan; Jennings, Paul.

In: Safety Science, Vol. 99, No. (Part B), 01.11.2017, p. 166-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khastgir, Siddartha ; Birrell, Stewart ; Dhadyalla, Gunwant ; Sivencrona, Håkan ; Jennings, Paul. / Towards increased reliability by objectification of Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) of automated automotive systems. In: Safety Science. 2017 ; Vol. 99, No. (Part B). pp. 166-177.
@article{66404fc21dde45ca93031c5b573e2780,
title = "Towards increased reliability by objectification of Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) of automated automotive systems",
abstract = "Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) in various domains like automotive, aviation, and process industry suffers from the issues of validity and reliability. While there has been an increasing appreciation of this subject, there have been limited approaches to overcome these issues. In the automotive domain, HARA is influenced by the ISO 26262 international standard which details functional safety of road vehicles. While ISO 26262 was a major step towards analysing hazards and risks, like other domains, it is also plagued by the issues of reliability. In this paper, the authors discuss the automotive HARA process. While exposing the reliability challenges of the HARA process detailed by the standard, the authors present an approach to overcome the reliability issues. The approach is obtained by creating a rule-set for automotive HARA to determine the Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) by parametrizing the individual components of an automotive HARA, i.e., severity, exposure and controllability. The initial rule-set was put to test by conducting a workshop involving international functional safety experts as participants in an experiment where rules were provided for severity and controllability ratings. Based on the qualitative results of the experiments, the rule-set was re-calibrated. The proposed HARA approach by the creation of a rule-set demonstrated reduction in variation. However, the caveat lies in the fact that the rule-set needs to be exhaustive or sufficiently explained in order to avoid any degree of subjective interpretation which is a source of variation and unreliability.",
keywords = "Functional safety, HARA, Hazard, ISO 26262, Reliability",
author = "Siddartha Khastgir and Stewart Birrell and Gunwant Dhadyalla and H{\aa}kan Sivencrona and Paul Jennings",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.024",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "166--177",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "(Part B)",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards increased reliability by objectification of Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) of automated automotive systems

AU - Khastgir, Siddartha

AU - Birrell, Stewart

AU - Dhadyalla, Gunwant

AU - Sivencrona, Håkan

AU - Jennings, Paul

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) in various domains like automotive, aviation, and process industry suffers from the issues of validity and reliability. While there has been an increasing appreciation of this subject, there have been limited approaches to overcome these issues. In the automotive domain, HARA is influenced by the ISO 26262 international standard which details functional safety of road vehicles. While ISO 26262 was a major step towards analysing hazards and risks, like other domains, it is also plagued by the issues of reliability. In this paper, the authors discuss the automotive HARA process. While exposing the reliability challenges of the HARA process detailed by the standard, the authors present an approach to overcome the reliability issues. The approach is obtained by creating a rule-set for automotive HARA to determine the Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) by parametrizing the individual components of an automotive HARA, i.e., severity, exposure and controllability. The initial rule-set was put to test by conducting a workshop involving international functional safety experts as participants in an experiment where rules were provided for severity and controllability ratings. Based on the qualitative results of the experiments, the rule-set was re-calibrated. The proposed HARA approach by the creation of a rule-set demonstrated reduction in variation. However, the caveat lies in the fact that the rule-set needs to be exhaustive or sufficiently explained in order to avoid any degree of subjective interpretation which is a source of variation and unreliability.

AB - Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) in various domains like automotive, aviation, and process industry suffers from the issues of validity and reliability. While there has been an increasing appreciation of this subject, there have been limited approaches to overcome these issues. In the automotive domain, HARA is influenced by the ISO 26262 international standard which details functional safety of road vehicles. While ISO 26262 was a major step towards analysing hazards and risks, like other domains, it is also plagued by the issues of reliability. In this paper, the authors discuss the automotive HARA process. While exposing the reliability challenges of the HARA process detailed by the standard, the authors present an approach to overcome the reliability issues. The approach is obtained by creating a rule-set for automotive HARA to determine the Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) by parametrizing the individual components of an automotive HARA, i.e., severity, exposure and controllability. The initial rule-set was put to test by conducting a workshop involving international functional safety experts as participants in an experiment where rules were provided for severity and controllability ratings. Based on the qualitative results of the experiments, the rule-set was re-calibrated. The proposed HARA approach by the creation of a rule-set demonstrated reduction in variation. However, the caveat lies in the fact that the rule-set needs to be exhaustive or sufficiently explained in order to avoid any degree of subjective interpretation which is a source of variation and unreliability.

KW - Functional safety

KW - HARA

KW - Hazard

KW - ISO 26262

KW - Reliability

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/towards-increased-reliability-objectification-hazard-analysis-risk-assessment-hara-automated-automot-1

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.024

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.024

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 166

EP - 177

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

IS - (Part B)

ER -