Towards a consensus on the understanding and analysis of the pulse waveform: Results from the 2016 Workshop on Arterial Hemodynamics: Past, present and future

P. Segers, M.F. O'Rourke, K. Parker, N. Westerhof, A. Hughes, Participants of the 2016 Workshop on Arterial Hemodynamics: Past, present and future, J. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper aims to summarize and map contemporary views on some contentious aspects of arterial hemodynamics that have remained unresolved despite years of research. These were discussed during a workshop entitled Arterial hemodynamics: past, present and future held in London on June 14 and 15, 2016. To do this we formulated a list of potential consensus statements informed by discussion at the meeting in London and quantified the degree of agreement and invited comments from the participants of the workshop. Overall the responses and comments show a high measure of quantitative agreement with the various proposed ‘consensus’ statements. Taken together, these statements seem a useful basis for proceeding with a more detailed and comprehensive consensus document on the current understanding and approaches to analysis of the pulse waveform. Future efforts should be directed at identifying remaining areas of dispute and future topics for research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-80
JournalArtery Research
Volume18
Issue numberC
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes
EventWorkshop on Arterial Hemodynamics: Past, present and future - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 14 Jun 201615 Jun 2016

Bibliographical note

John Allen contributed as a participant of the 2016 Workshop on Arterial Hemodynamics: Past, present and future

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a consensus on the understanding and analysis of the pulse waveform: Results from the 2016 Workshop on Arterial Hemodynamics: Past, present and future'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this