To Helmand and Back

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reflects on the Court Martial Appeal Court decision in R. v Blackman (Alexander Wayne) on whether a soldier who had killed a wounded insurgent in Helmand province, Afghanistan, should have his murder conviction replaced with one of manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility. Identifies procedural and other issues with the case going beyond its criminal law focus to encompass the UK's duties under the ECHR art.2 and the art.15 derogation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)322-324
Number of pages3
JournalCriminal Law & Justice Weekly
Volume181
Issue number19
Publication statusPublished - 20 May 2017

Fingerprint

homicide
ECHR
criminal law
court decision
Afghanistan
soldier
appeal
responsibility

Cite this

To Helmand and Back. / Stanford, Ben.

In: Criminal Law & Justice Weekly, Vol. 181, No. 19, 20.05.2017, p. 322-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stanford, B 2017, 'To Helmand and Back' Criminal Law & Justice Weekly, vol. 181, no. 19, pp. 322-324.
Stanford, Ben. / To Helmand and Back. In: Criminal Law & Justice Weekly. 2017 ; Vol. 181, No. 19. pp. 322-324.
@article{1f8f16435d1a4646afc2eee2775ca559,
title = "To Helmand and Back",
abstract = "Reflects on the Court Martial Appeal Court decision in R. v Blackman (Alexander Wayne) on whether a soldier who had killed a wounded insurgent in Helmand province, Afghanistan, should have his murder conviction replaced with one of manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility. Identifies procedural and other issues with the case going beyond its criminal law focus to encompass the UK's duties under the ECHR art.2 and the art.15 derogation.",
author = "Ben Stanford",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "20",
language = "English",
volume = "181",
pages = "322--324",
journal = "Criminal Law & Justice Weekly",
issn = "1759-7943",
publisher = "Lexis-Nexis",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - To Helmand and Back

AU - Stanford, Ben

PY - 2017/5/20

Y1 - 2017/5/20

N2 - Reflects on the Court Martial Appeal Court decision in R. v Blackman (Alexander Wayne) on whether a soldier who had killed a wounded insurgent in Helmand province, Afghanistan, should have his murder conviction replaced with one of manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility. Identifies procedural and other issues with the case going beyond its criminal law focus to encompass the UK's duties under the ECHR art.2 and the art.15 derogation.

AB - Reflects on the Court Martial Appeal Court decision in R. v Blackman (Alexander Wayne) on whether a soldier who had killed a wounded insurgent in Helmand province, Afghanistan, should have his murder conviction replaced with one of manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility. Identifies procedural and other issues with the case going beyond its criminal law focus to encompass the UK's duties under the ECHR art.2 and the art.15 derogation.

UR - https://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk/issue/Vol181-No19

M3 - Article

VL - 181

SP - 322

EP - 324

JO - Criminal Law & Justice Weekly

JF - Criminal Law & Justice Weekly

SN - 1759-7943

IS - 19

ER -