Abstract
The South Sudan peace agreement provides for transitional justice mechanisms aimed at fostering justice and reconciliation. They include the Commission for Truth, Reconciliation and Healing (CTRH) and the Hybrid Court for South Sudan (HCSS). Drawing on qualitative data obtained from interviews, document reviews, and archival research conducted between October 2019 and June 2020 in Addis Ababa, Kampala, and Nairobi, this study delves into the current transitional justice discourses in South Sudan with a particular focus on truth-telling and accountability. The study finds that key contestations relate to when to initiate and implement transitional justice mechanisms, warning that, if not carefully timed, those mechanisms may have a negative impact on the peace process.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 9-33 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Journal of the British Academy |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | S2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 25 May 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
© The author(s) 2021. This is an open access article licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License
Funder
This research was funded, in part, by the Peace Research Grant Program of theInternational Peace Research Association Foundation
Keywords
- South Sudan
- accountability
- justice
- peace
- reconciliation
- transitional justice
- truth-telling
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)