The use of the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) in ecotoxicology has been consistently criticized for over 30 years. A search of the literature from the past 30 years found 22 articles challenging the validity and/or appropriateness of NOEC/LOEC data compared to only one in defense of such data. Notwithstanding this compelling weight of evidence, the NOEC and LOEC remain commonly published measures of toxicity from ecotoxicological studies. In this article we argue that the major reason for the continued generation and publication of NOEC/LOEC data is that key government and intergovernmental organizations have been ''sitting on the fence'' on the issue for more than a decade. Although most key environmental qualityguideline, toxicity testing, and associated guidance documents have now recognized the limitations of NOEC/LOEC data, to date no such document or standard toxicity test method has formally ceased recommending or providing guidance on the generation of such data. This is a problem because it is these very guidance documents and test methods that regulatory agencies demand be used by industry for regulatory activities, and on which commercial testing facilities attain and maintain their testing accreditation. Consequently, there will be little impetus for change to statistical analysis practices unless changes to the key guidance documents and test methods necessitate it. Although some progress on this has been made (e.g., in Canada, Australia and New Zealand), there needs to be stronger and universal action to ensure NOEC/LOEC data are no longer generated.
|Number of pages||4|
|Journal||Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management|
|Early online date||3 Feb 2012|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Apr 2012|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Environmental Science(all)