Thinking, design. A construct of (and for) change

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Design philosophy has evolved; a cross-over of research and design. This
paradigm shift incorporates philosophical thinking and qualitative research standards of replicable methods, informed ethical conduct and robust evidence to inform the ‘art’. We propose that such thinking-design is advantageous; not being instinctively nor egocentrically biased. An increasing compatibility between designer, user and researcher is resulting in, and from, participatory action research (PAR) methods that gather deep insight. But participation is not the same as autonomy and when working collaboratively, PAR presents empowerment in-balance between ‘researching experts’ and ‘using-experts’; the latter’s needs motivated by aspiration and emotion, rather than professional rigour of the former. Thinking, design is focused by a lens of prospective and retrospective user-led enlightenment. This poster will illustrate that democratic design does not inhibit the artistry for which design is so famed but rather
that embedded collaboration to address experiential problems is advantageous, and desirable.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2155-2156
Number of pages2
JournalDesign Journal
Volume22
Issue numbersup1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2019
Event13th International Conference of the European Academy of Design : Running with Scissors - University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
Duration: 10 Apr 201912 Apr 2019
Conference number: 13
https://ead2019dundee.com/welcome/
https://ead2019dundee.com

Fingerprint

Lenses
Lead
Participatory Action Research
Autonomy
Research Methods
Design philosophy
Enlightenment
Qualitative Research
Art
Designer
Aspiration
Emotion
Empowerment
Artistry
Participation
Compatibility
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Prospective
  • Retrospective
  • Co-Creation
  • responsible
  • Design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cite this

Thinking, design. A construct of (and for) change. / Magee, Paul; Woodcock, Andrée.

In: Design Journal, Vol. 22, No. sup1, 31.05.2019, p. 2155-2156.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{2a320d16dc1448a180518d930e9006d0,
title = "Thinking, design. A construct of (and for) change",
abstract = "Design philosophy has evolved; a cross-over of research and design. Thisparadigm shift incorporates philosophical thinking and qualitative research standards of replicable methods, informed ethical conduct and robust evidence to inform the ‘art’. We propose that such thinking-design is advantageous; not being instinctively nor egocentrically biased. An increasing compatibility between designer, user and researcher is resulting in, and from, participatory action research (PAR) methods that gather deep insight. But participation is not the same as autonomy and when working collaboratively, PAR presents empowerment in-balance between ‘researching experts’ and ‘using-experts’; the latter’s needs motivated by aspiration and emotion, rather than professional rigour of the former. Thinking, design is focused by a lens of prospective and retrospective user-led enlightenment. This poster will illustrate that democratic design does not inhibit the artistry for which design is so famed but ratherthat embedded collaboration to address experiential problems is advantageous, and desirable.",
keywords = "Prospective, Retrospective, Co-Creation, responsible, Design",
author = "Paul Magee and Andr{\'e}e Woodcock",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/14606925.2019.1595451",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "2155--2156",
journal = "Design Journal",
issn = "1460-6925",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "sup1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thinking, design. A construct of (and for) change

AU - Magee, Paul

AU - Woodcock, Andrée

PY - 2019/5/31

Y1 - 2019/5/31

N2 - Design philosophy has evolved; a cross-over of research and design. Thisparadigm shift incorporates philosophical thinking and qualitative research standards of replicable methods, informed ethical conduct and robust evidence to inform the ‘art’. We propose that such thinking-design is advantageous; not being instinctively nor egocentrically biased. An increasing compatibility between designer, user and researcher is resulting in, and from, participatory action research (PAR) methods that gather deep insight. But participation is not the same as autonomy and when working collaboratively, PAR presents empowerment in-balance between ‘researching experts’ and ‘using-experts’; the latter’s needs motivated by aspiration and emotion, rather than professional rigour of the former. Thinking, design is focused by a lens of prospective and retrospective user-led enlightenment. This poster will illustrate that democratic design does not inhibit the artistry for which design is so famed but ratherthat embedded collaboration to address experiential problems is advantageous, and desirable.

AB - Design philosophy has evolved; a cross-over of research and design. Thisparadigm shift incorporates philosophical thinking and qualitative research standards of replicable methods, informed ethical conduct and robust evidence to inform the ‘art’. We propose that such thinking-design is advantageous; not being instinctively nor egocentrically biased. An increasing compatibility between designer, user and researcher is resulting in, and from, participatory action research (PAR) methods that gather deep insight. But participation is not the same as autonomy and when working collaboratively, PAR presents empowerment in-balance between ‘researching experts’ and ‘using-experts’; the latter’s needs motivated by aspiration and emotion, rather than professional rigour of the former. Thinking, design is focused by a lens of prospective and retrospective user-led enlightenment. This poster will illustrate that democratic design does not inhibit the artistry for which design is so famed but ratherthat embedded collaboration to address experiential problems is advantageous, and desirable.

KW - Prospective

KW - Retrospective

KW - Co-Creation

KW - responsible

KW - Design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067172865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14606925.2019.1595451

DO - 10.1080/14606925.2019.1595451

M3 - Conference article

VL - 22

SP - 2155

EP - 2156

JO - Design Journal

JF - Design Journal

SN - 1460-6925

IS - sup1

ER -