They’re not racist: Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue

Susan Condor, Lia Figgou, Jackie Abell, Stephen Gibson, Clifford Stevenson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    96 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    social scientific work on the suppression, mitigation or denial of prejudiced attitudes has tended to focus on the strategic self-presentation and self-monitoring undertaken by individual social actors on their own behalf. In this paper, we argue that existing perspectives might usefully be extended to incorporate three additional considerations. First, that social actors may, on some occasions, act to defend not only themselves, but also others from charges of prejudice. Second, that over the course of any social encounter, interactants may take joint responsibility for policing conversation and for correcting and suppressing the articulation of prejudiced talk. Third, that a focus on the dialogic character of conversation affords an appreciation of the ways in which the status of any particular utterance, action or event as ‘racist’ or ‘prejudiced’ may constitute a social accomplishment. Finally, we note the logical corollary of these observations – that in everyday life, the occurrence of ‘racist discourse’ is likely to represent a collaborative accomplishment, the responsibility for which is shared jointly between the person of the speaker and those other co-present individuals who occasion, reinforce or simply fail to suppress it.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)441-462
    Number of pages21
    JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume45
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2006

    Fingerprint

    social actor
    suppression
    prejudice
    conversation
    dialogue
    responsibility
    self-presentation
    everyday life
    monitoring
    human being
    event
    discourse
    present
    Denial (Psychology)

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychology(all)
    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    They’re not racist: Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue. / Condor, Susan; Figgou, Lia; Abell, Jackie; Gibson, Stephen; Stevenson, Clifford.

    In: British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 45, No. 3, 09.2006, p. 441-462.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Condor, Susan ; Figgou, Lia ; Abell, Jackie ; Gibson, Stephen ; Stevenson, Clifford. / They’re not racist: Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue. In: British Journal of Social Psychology. 2006 ; Vol. 45, No. 3. pp. 441-462.
    @article{17baef4566284c9db5a70f31b68ddfdd,
    title = "They’re not racist: Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue",
    abstract = "social scientific work on the suppression, mitigation or denial of prejudiced attitudes has tended to focus on the strategic self-presentation and self-monitoring undertaken by individual social actors on their own behalf. In this paper, we argue that existing perspectives might usefully be extended to incorporate three additional considerations. First, that social actors may, on some occasions, act to defend not only themselves, but also others from charges of prejudice. Second, that over the course of any social encounter, interactants may take joint responsibility for policing conversation and for correcting and suppressing the articulation of prejudiced talk. Third, that a focus on the dialogic character of conversation affords an appreciation of the ways in which the status of any particular utterance, action or event as ‘racist’ or ‘prejudiced’ may constitute a social accomplishment. Finally, we note the logical corollary of these observations – that in everyday life, the occurrence of ‘racist discourse’ is likely to represent a collaborative accomplishment, the responsibility for which is shared jointly between the person of the speaker and those other co-present individuals who occasion, reinforce or simply fail to suppress it.",
    author = "Susan Condor and Lia Figgou and Jackie Abell and Stephen Gibson and Clifford Stevenson",
    year = "2006",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1348/014466605X66817",
    language = "English",
    volume = "45",
    pages = "441--462",
    journal = "British Journal of Social Psychology",
    issn = "0144-6665",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - They’re not racist: Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue

    AU - Condor, Susan

    AU - Figgou, Lia

    AU - Abell, Jackie

    AU - Gibson, Stephen

    AU - Stevenson, Clifford

    PY - 2006/9

    Y1 - 2006/9

    N2 - social scientific work on the suppression, mitigation or denial of prejudiced attitudes has tended to focus on the strategic self-presentation and self-monitoring undertaken by individual social actors on their own behalf. In this paper, we argue that existing perspectives might usefully be extended to incorporate three additional considerations. First, that social actors may, on some occasions, act to defend not only themselves, but also others from charges of prejudice. Second, that over the course of any social encounter, interactants may take joint responsibility for policing conversation and for correcting and suppressing the articulation of prejudiced talk. Third, that a focus on the dialogic character of conversation affords an appreciation of the ways in which the status of any particular utterance, action or event as ‘racist’ or ‘prejudiced’ may constitute a social accomplishment. Finally, we note the logical corollary of these observations – that in everyday life, the occurrence of ‘racist discourse’ is likely to represent a collaborative accomplishment, the responsibility for which is shared jointly between the person of the speaker and those other co-present individuals who occasion, reinforce or simply fail to suppress it.

    AB - social scientific work on the suppression, mitigation or denial of prejudiced attitudes has tended to focus on the strategic self-presentation and self-monitoring undertaken by individual social actors on their own behalf. In this paper, we argue that existing perspectives might usefully be extended to incorporate three additional considerations. First, that social actors may, on some occasions, act to defend not only themselves, but also others from charges of prejudice. Second, that over the course of any social encounter, interactants may take joint responsibility for policing conversation and for correcting and suppressing the articulation of prejudiced talk. Third, that a focus on the dialogic character of conversation affords an appreciation of the ways in which the status of any particular utterance, action or event as ‘racist’ or ‘prejudiced’ may constitute a social accomplishment. Finally, we note the logical corollary of these observations – that in everyday life, the occurrence of ‘racist discourse’ is likely to represent a collaborative accomplishment, the responsibility for which is shared jointly between the person of the speaker and those other co-present individuals who occasion, reinforce or simply fail to suppress it.

    U2 - 10.1348/014466605X66817

    DO - 10.1348/014466605X66817

    M3 - Article

    VL - 45

    SP - 441

    EP - 462

    JO - British Journal of Social Psychology

    JF - British Journal of Social Psychology

    SN - 0144-6665

    IS - 3

    ER -