Thermal performance of vacuum glazing with tempered glass panes

Yueping Fang, T.J. Hyde, F. Arya, N. Hewitt

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Abstract

The thermal performance (U-value) of 0.4 × 0.4 m and 1 × 1 m double vacuum glazing (DVG) and triple vacuum glazing (TVG) using annealed and tempered glass panes with pillar separations of 25 and 50 mm respectively was simulated. It was found that (1) for both dimensions of DVG with 0.03 emittance low-emittance (low-e) coatings, the U-values at the centre of the glazing area of the DVG made of annealed and tempered glass panes were 0.57 and 0.30 Wm−2 K−1, a reduction of 47.4 %; (2) for both dimensions of TVG with 0.03 emittance low-e coating, the U-values at the centre of glazing area of the TVG with annealed and tempered glass panes were 0.28 and 0.11 Wm−2 K−1, a reduction of 60.7 %. The reduction in U-values for both DVG and TVG results from the significant reduction in pillar number, leading to the large reduction in heat conduction through the pillar arrays. The reduction in U-values from using tempered glass panes instead of annealed glass panes for TVG is larger than that for DVG; this is because the radiative heat transfer of TVG with three glass panes is much lower than that in DVG with two glass panes; therefore, the heat conduction through the pillar array in TVG plays a larger role compared with that in DVG. The reduction in pillar number in TVG results in a larger reduction in U-value compared to DVG; thus, using tempered glass panes in TVG confers a greater advantage compared to DVG, given that DVG can also achieve a large reduction in U-value when switching from using annealed glass panes to tempered glass panes
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication Mediterranean Green Buildings & Renewable Energy
EditorsAli Sayigh
PublisherSpringer
Pages275-291
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-30745-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventWorld Renewable Energy Forum - Florence, Italy
Duration: 26 Aug 201528 Aug 2015
http://www.wrenuk.co.uk/wrec10/Final%20Programme%20Mission%20Statement.pdf

Conference

ConferenceWorld Renewable Energy Forum
Abbreviated titleWREC 2015
CountryItaly
CityFlorence
Period26/08/1528/08/15
Internet address

Fingerprint

vacuum
glass
emittance
conductive heat transfer
coatings
radiative heat transfer

Bibliographical note

This chapter is not available in Pure.

Keywords

  • annealed glass
  • pillar separation
  • tempered glass
  • vacuum glazing,
  • U-value

Cite this

Fang, Y., Hyde, T. J., Arya, F., & Hewitt, N. (2016). Thermal performance of vacuum glazing with tempered glass panes. In A. Sayigh (Ed.), Mediterranean Green Buildings & Renewable Energy (pp. 275-291). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30746-6_20

Thermal performance of vacuum glazing with tempered glass panes. / Fang, Yueping; Hyde, T.J.; Arya, F.; Hewitt, N.

Mediterranean Green Buildings & Renewable Energy. ed. / Ali Sayigh. Springer, 2016. p. 275-291.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Fang, Y, Hyde, TJ, Arya, F & Hewitt, N 2016, Thermal performance of vacuum glazing with tempered glass panes. in A Sayigh (ed.), Mediterranean Green Buildings & Renewable Energy. Springer, pp. 275-291, World Renewable Energy Forum, Florence, Italy, 26/08/15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30746-6_20
Fang Y, Hyde TJ, Arya F, Hewitt N. Thermal performance of vacuum glazing with tempered glass panes. In Sayigh A, editor, Mediterranean Green Buildings & Renewable Energy. Springer. 2016. p. 275-291 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30746-6_20
Fang, Yueping ; Hyde, T.J. ; Arya, F. ; Hewitt, N. / Thermal performance of vacuum glazing with tempered glass panes. Mediterranean Green Buildings & Renewable Energy. editor / Ali Sayigh. Springer, 2016. pp. 275-291
@inproceedings{1a69201a19944e878bf8eb174a30d779,
title = "Thermal performance of vacuum glazing with tempered glass panes",
abstract = "The thermal performance (U-value) of 0.4 × 0.4 m and 1 × 1 m double vacuum glazing (DVG) and triple vacuum glazing (TVG) using annealed and tempered glass panes with pillar separations of 25 and 50 mm respectively was simulated. It was found that (1) for both dimensions of DVG with 0.03 emittance low-emittance (low-e) coatings, the U-values at the centre of the glazing area of the DVG made of annealed and tempered glass panes were 0.57 and 0.30 Wm−2 K−1, a reduction of 47.4 {\%}; (2) for both dimensions of TVG with 0.03 emittance low-e coating, the U-values at the centre of glazing area of the TVG with annealed and tempered glass panes were 0.28 and 0.11 Wm−2 K−1, a reduction of 60.7 {\%}. The reduction in U-values for both DVG and TVG results from the significant reduction in pillar number, leading to the large reduction in heat conduction through the pillar arrays. The reduction in U-values from using tempered glass panes instead of annealed glass panes for TVG is larger than that for DVG; this is because the radiative heat transfer of TVG with three glass panes is much lower than that in DVG with two glass panes; therefore, the heat conduction through the pillar array in TVG plays a larger role compared with that in DVG. The reduction in pillar number in TVG results in a larger reduction in U-value compared to DVG; thus, using tempered glass panes in TVG confers a greater advantage compared to DVG, given that DVG can also achieve a large reduction in U-value when switching from using annealed glass panes to tempered glass panes",
keywords = "annealed glass, pillar separation, tempered glass, vacuum glazing,, U-value",
author = "Yueping Fang and T.J. Hyde and F. Arya and N. Hewitt",
note = "This chapter is not available in Pure.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-30746-6_20",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-30745-9",
pages = "275--291",
editor = "Ali Sayigh",
booktitle = "Mediterranean Green Buildings & Renewable Energy",
publisher = "Springer",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Thermal performance of vacuum glazing with tempered glass panes

AU - Fang, Yueping

AU - Hyde, T.J.

AU - Arya, F.

AU - Hewitt, N.

N1 - This chapter is not available in Pure.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The thermal performance (U-value) of 0.4 × 0.4 m and 1 × 1 m double vacuum glazing (DVG) and triple vacuum glazing (TVG) using annealed and tempered glass panes with pillar separations of 25 and 50 mm respectively was simulated. It was found that (1) for both dimensions of DVG with 0.03 emittance low-emittance (low-e) coatings, the U-values at the centre of the glazing area of the DVG made of annealed and tempered glass panes were 0.57 and 0.30 Wm−2 K−1, a reduction of 47.4 %; (2) for both dimensions of TVG with 0.03 emittance low-e coating, the U-values at the centre of glazing area of the TVG with annealed and tempered glass panes were 0.28 and 0.11 Wm−2 K−1, a reduction of 60.7 %. The reduction in U-values for both DVG and TVG results from the significant reduction in pillar number, leading to the large reduction in heat conduction through the pillar arrays. The reduction in U-values from using tempered glass panes instead of annealed glass panes for TVG is larger than that for DVG; this is because the radiative heat transfer of TVG with three glass panes is much lower than that in DVG with two glass panes; therefore, the heat conduction through the pillar array in TVG plays a larger role compared with that in DVG. The reduction in pillar number in TVG results in a larger reduction in U-value compared to DVG; thus, using tempered glass panes in TVG confers a greater advantage compared to DVG, given that DVG can also achieve a large reduction in U-value when switching from using annealed glass panes to tempered glass panes

AB - The thermal performance (U-value) of 0.4 × 0.4 m and 1 × 1 m double vacuum glazing (DVG) and triple vacuum glazing (TVG) using annealed and tempered glass panes with pillar separations of 25 and 50 mm respectively was simulated. It was found that (1) for both dimensions of DVG with 0.03 emittance low-emittance (low-e) coatings, the U-values at the centre of the glazing area of the DVG made of annealed and tempered glass panes were 0.57 and 0.30 Wm−2 K−1, a reduction of 47.4 %; (2) for both dimensions of TVG with 0.03 emittance low-e coating, the U-values at the centre of glazing area of the TVG with annealed and tempered glass panes were 0.28 and 0.11 Wm−2 K−1, a reduction of 60.7 %. The reduction in U-values for both DVG and TVG results from the significant reduction in pillar number, leading to the large reduction in heat conduction through the pillar arrays. The reduction in U-values from using tempered glass panes instead of annealed glass panes for TVG is larger than that for DVG; this is because the radiative heat transfer of TVG with three glass panes is much lower than that in DVG with two glass panes; therefore, the heat conduction through the pillar array in TVG plays a larger role compared with that in DVG. The reduction in pillar number in TVG results in a larger reduction in U-value compared to DVG; thus, using tempered glass panes in TVG confers a greater advantage compared to DVG, given that DVG can also achieve a large reduction in U-value when switching from using annealed glass panes to tempered glass panes

KW - annealed glass

KW - pillar separation

KW - tempered glass

KW - vacuum glazing,

KW - U-value

UR - https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=qmq3DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA275&lpg=PA275&dq=10.1007/978-3-319-30746-6_20&source=bl&ots=72fAzN-8yF&sig=R37tFYybdXnw4fImwMRFLkgPsDo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjHsYOa5tbeAhUqCMAKHa6tDrsQ6AEwAnoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=10.1007%2F978-3-319-30746-6_20&f=false

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-30746-6_20

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-30746-6_20

M3 - Conference proceeding

SN - 978-3-319-30745-9

SP - 275

EP - 291

BT - Mediterranean Green Buildings & Renewable Energy

A2 - Sayigh, Ali

PB - Springer

ER -