THERACOM: a systematic review of the evidence base for interventions to improve Therapeutic Communications between black and minority ethnic populations and staff in specialist mental health services

K. Bhui, R. McCabe, S. Weich, S. Singh, M. Johnson, Ala Szczepura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) groups in receipt of specialist mental health care have reported higher rates of detention under the mental health act, less use of psychological therapies, and more dissatisfaction. Although many explanations have been put forward to explain this, a failure of therapeutic communications may explain poorer satisfaction, disengagement from services and ethnic variations in access to less coercive care. Interventions that improve therapeutic communications may offer new approaches to tackle ethnic inequalities in experiences and outcomes. Methods The THERACOM project is an HTA-funded evidence synthesis review of interventions to improve therapeutic communications between black and minority ethnic patients in contact with specialist mental health services and staff providing those services. This article sets out the protocol methods for a necessarily broad review topic, including appropriate search strategies, dilemmas for classifying different types of therapeutic communications and expectations of the types of interventions to improve them. The review methods will accommodate unexpected types of study and interventions. The findings will be reported in 2013, including a synthesis of the quantitative and grey literature. Discussion A particular methodological challenge is to identify and rate the quality of many different study types, for example, randomised controlled trials, observational quantitative studies, qualitative studies and case studies, which comprise the full range of hierarchies of evidence. We discuss the preliminary methodological challenges and some solutions. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42011001661).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume2
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Mental Health Services
Communication
Population
Mental Health
Literature
Therapeutics
Minority Groups
Ethnic Groups
Observational Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials
Psychology
Delivery of Health Care

Bibliographical note

Full text available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-15

Keywords

  • Interventions
  • Therapeutic communications
  • Black and minority ethnic patients
  • Psychiatric services

Cite this

@article{716c1c73f9264d9ea5f08c317e9c43fc,
title = "THERACOM: a systematic review of the evidence base for interventions to improve Therapeutic Communications between black and minority ethnic populations and staff in specialist mental health services",
abstract = "Background Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) groups in receipt of specialist mental health care have reported higher rates of detention under the mental health act, less use of psychological therapies, and more dissatisfaction. Although many explanations have been put forward to explain this, a failure of therapeutic communications may explain poorer satisfaction, disengagement from services and ethnic variations in access to less coercive care. Interventions that improve therapeutic communications may offer new approaches to tackle ethnic inequalities in experiences and outcomes. Methods The THERACOM project is an HTA-funded evidence synthesis review of interventions to improve therapeutic communications between black and minority ethnic patients in contact with specialist mental health services and staff providing those services. This article sets out the protocol methods for a necessarily broad review topic, including appropriate search strategies, dilemmas for classifying different types of therapeutic communications and expectations of the types of interventions to improve them. The review methods will accommodate unexpected types of study and interventions. The findings will be reported in 2013, including a synthesis of the quantitative and grey literature. Discussion A particular methodological challenge is to identify and rate the quality of many different study types, for example, randomised controlled trials, observational quantitative studies, qualitative studies and case studies, which comprise the full range of hierarchies of evidence. We discuss the preliminary methodological challenges and some solutions. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42011001661).",
keywords = "Interventions, Therapeutic communications, Black and minority ethnic patients, Psychiatric services",
author = "K. Bhui and R. McCabe and S. Weich and S. Singh and M. Johnson and Ala Szczepura",
note = "Full text available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-15",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1186/2046-4053-2-15",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Systematic Reviews",
issn = "2046-4053",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - THERACOM: a systematic review of the evidence base for interventions to improve Therapeutic Communications between black and minority ethnic populations and staff in specialist mental health services

AU - Bhui, K.

AU - McCabe, R.

AU - Weich, S.

AU - Singh, S.

AU - Johnson, M.

AU - Szczepura, Ala

N1 - Full text available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-15

PY - 2013/2/25

Y1 - 2013/2/25

N2 - Background Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) groups in receipt of specialist mental health care have reported higher rates of detention under the mental health act, less use of psychological therapies, and more dissatisfaction. Although many explanations have been put forward to explain this, a failure of therapeutic communications may explain poorer satisfaction, disengagement from services and ethnic variations in access to less coercive care. Interventions that improve therapeutic communications may offer new approaches to tackle ethnic inequalities in experiences and outcomes. Methods The THERACOM project is an HTA-funded evidence synthesis review of interventions to improve therapeutic communications between black and minority ethnic patients in contact with specialist mental health services and staff providing those services. This article sets out the protocol methods for a necessarily broad review topic, including appropriate search strategies, dilemmas for classifying different types of therapeutic communications and expectations of the types of interventions to improve them. The review methods will accommodate unexpected types of study and interventions. The findings will be reported in 2013, including a synthesis of the quantitative and grey literature. Discussion A particular methodological challenge is to identify and rate the quality of many different study types, for example, randomised controlled trials, observational quantitative studies, qualitative studies and case studies, which comprise the full range of hierarchies of evidence. We discuss the preliminary methodological challenges and some solutions. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42011001661).

AB - Background Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) groups in receipt of specialist mental health care have reported higher rates of detention under the mental health act, less use of psychological therapies, and more dissatisfaction. Although many explanations have been put forward to explain this, a failure of therapeutic communications may explain poorer satisfaction, disengagement from services and ethnic variations in access to less coercive care. Interventions that improve therapeutic communications may offer new approaches to tackle ethnic inequalities in experiences and outcomes. Methods The THERACOM project is an HTA-funded evidence synthesis review of interventions to improve therapeutic communications between black and minority ethnic patients in contact with specialist mental health services and staff providing those services. This article sets out the protocol methods for a necessarily broad review topic, including appropriate search strategies, dilemmas for classifying different types of therapeutic communications and expectations of the types of interventions to improve them. The review methods will accommodate unexpected types of study and interventions. The findings will be reported in 2013, including a synthesis of the quantitative and grey literature. Discussion A particular methodological challenge is to identify and rate the quality of many different study types, for example, randomised controlled trials, observational quantitative studies, qualitative studies and case studies, which comprise the full range of hierarchies of evidence. We discuss the preliminary methodological challenges and some solutions. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42011001661).

KW - Interventions

KW - Therapeutic communications

KW - Black and minority ethnic patients

KW - Psychiatric services

U2 - 10.1186/2046-4053-2-15

DO - 10.1186/2046-4053-2-15

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Systematic Reviews

JF - Systematic Reviews

SN - 2046-4053

IS - 15

ER -