TY - JOUR
T1 - The validity and reproducibility of perceptually regulated exercise responses during combined arm + leg cycling
AU - Hill, M.
AU - Puddiford, M.
AU - Talbot, C.
AU - Price, M.
N1 - A Correction to this article was published on 06 October 2020.
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00421-020-04444-z
Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Purpose: Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a reliable method of assessing exercise intensity during isolated arm and leg cycling. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of perceptually regulated exercise responses during combined arm + leg cycling. Methods: Twelve males (age; 24.6 ± 5.3 years, height; 1.81 ± 0.7 m, mass; 83.1 ± 8.4 kg) initially undertook incremental exercise tests to volitional exhaustion for arm cycling (133 ± 14 W) and leg cycling (253 ± 32 W). On three subsequent occasions, participants undertook combined arm + leg cycling trials using two modified Monark ergometers involving three bouts of exercise at RPE 9, 13 and 17, in that order. Heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (V˙ O 2) and pulmonary ventilation (V˙ E) were recorded continuously. Results: No significant differences were observed for HR (P = 0.086), V˙ O 2 (P = 0.525) and V˙ E (P = 0.899) between trials, whilst significant differences were observed between each level of RPE (all P < 0.001). For % peak V˙ O 2, the ICC increased with successive trials for all RPE levels. For % maximal HR the ICC generally decreased with successive trials. Conclusion: RPE can be used as a reliable frame of reference for the production of exercise intensity during combined arm + leg cycling without any formal familiarisation. Since combined arm + leg cycling elicits a greater energy expenditure than arm or leg work alone, this novel mode of non-weight bearing exercise might prove effective for aerobic conditioning and weight control.
AB - Purpose: Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a reliable method of assessing exercise intensity during isolated arm and leg cycling. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of perceptually regulated exercise responses during combined arm + leg cycling. Methods: Twelve males (age; 24.6 ± 5.3 years, height; 1.81 ± 0.7 m, mass; 83.1 ± 8.4 kg) initially undertook incremental exercise tests to volitional exhaustion for arm cycling (133 ± 14 W) and leg cycling (253 ± 32 W). On three subsequent occasions, participants undertook combined arm + leg cycling trials using two modified Monark ergometers involving three bouts of exercise at RPE 9, 13 and 17, in that order. Heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (V˙ O 2) and pulmonary ventilation (V˙ E) were recorded continuously. Results: No significant differences were observed for HR (P = 0.086), V˙ O 2 (P = 0.525) and V˙ E (P = 0.899) between trials, whilst significant differences were observed between each level of RPE (all P < 0.001). For % peak V˙ O 2, the ICC increased with successive trials for all RPE levels. For % maximal HR the ICC generally decreased with successive trials. Conclusion: RPE can be used as a reliable frame of reference for the production of exercise intensity during combined arm + leg cycling without any formal familiarisation. Since combined arm + leg cycling elicits a greater energy expenditure than arm or leg work alone, this novel mode of non-weight bearing exercise might prove effective for aerobic conditioning and weight control.
KW - Combined arm + leg ergometry
KW - Effort perception
KW - Exercise mode
KW - Reliability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088383990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00421-020-04444-z
DO - 10.1007/s00421-020-04444-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088383990
SN - 1439-6319
VL - 120
SP - 2203
EP - 2212
JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 10
ER -