Abstract
This study analyzes the positions of the U.S., the EC Commission and of the International maritime organizations and seeks to demonstrate that: 1. there is no appropriate legal framework for strengthening international public security; and 2. the qualification of the CSI and C-TPAT as maritime transport security measures, must be understood as a tool in establishing the authority of the EC Commission over the EC member states. The article discusses: 1. The ability of the United States to proceed unilaterally, within the legal framework of the law of the sea; 2. The character of the Container Security Initiative; 3. The position and role of the EC Commission; and 4. The position of the International Maritime Organization, which has been suggested as the appropriate international legal frame-work.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 139 - 161 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Ius Gentium |
| Volume | 10 |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Maritime transport security
- Container Security Initiative
- terrorism
- IMO
- EU
- USA
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The US Container Securiy Initiative: A Maritime Transport Security Measure or an (inter)National Public Security Measure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS