The urge to merge and the american cotton oil company

Albert Jolink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, I review some explanations for the Great Merger Movement (1895–1904) in the United States and confront these using the particularities of one of the prominent companies figuring in this movement: the American Cotton Oil Company. Subsequently, I argue that the literature on the Great Merger Movement by the commentators of the last 50 years may be complemented with an explanation that includes the dynamics of vertical integration, stressing patents and trademarks as protective measures in the transition of the company. As the American Cotton Oil Company case illustrates, the merger process can be explained, at least partially, as a defensive strategy through the centralization of management and the possibility of introducing cost-effective measures.This article emphasizes that accounting practices of the day and the valuation of goodwill, in particular, largely explain the success of the merger.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-399
Number of pages15
JournalManagement and Organizational History
Volume1
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mergers
Cotton
Oil
Trademark
Defensive strategy
Patents
Accounting practices
Vertical integration
Goodwill
Centralization
Vertical Integration
Particularity
Commentators
Costs

Keywords

  • American cotton oil company
  • Merger movement
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Transition
  • Vertical integration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • History
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

The urge to merge and the american cotton oil company. / Jolink, Albert.

In: Management and Organizational History, Vol. 1, No. 4, 01.11.2006, p. 385-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jolink, Albert. / The urge to merge and the american cotton oil company. In: Management and Organizational History. 2006 ; Vol. 1, No. 4. pp. 385-399.
@article{5f2fc4c3ae7d4349849fdeb9e810715d,
title = "The urge to merge and the american cotton oil company",
abstract = "In this article, I review some explanations for the Great Merger Movement (1895–1904) in the United States and confront these using the particularities of one of the prominent companies figuring in this movement: the American Cotton Oil Company. Subsequently, I argue that the literature on the Great Merger Movement by the commentators of the last 50 years may be complemented with an explanation that includes the dynamics of vertical integration, stressing patents and trademarks as protective measures in the transition of the company. As the American Cotton Oil Company case illustrates, the merger process can be explained, at least partially, as a defensive strategy through the centralization of management and the possibility of introducing cost-effective measures.This article emphasizes that accounting practices of the day and the valuation of goodwill, in particular, largely explain the success of the merger.",
keywords = "American cotton oil company, Merger movement, Patents, Trademarks, Transition, Vertical integration",
author = "Albert Jolink",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1744935906071911",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "385--399",
journal = "Management and Organizational History",
issn = "1744-9359",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The urge to merge and the american cotton oil company

AU - Jolink, Albert

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - In this article, I review some explanations for the Great Merger Movement (1895–1904) in the United States and confront these using the particularities of one of the prominent companies figuring in this movement: the American Cotton Oil Company. Subsequently, I argue that the literature on the Great Merger Movement by the commentators of the last 50 years may be complemented with an explanation that includes the dynamics of vertical integration, stressing patents and trademarks as protective measures in the transition of the company. As the American Cotton Oil Company case illustrates, the merger process can be explained, at least partially, as a defensive strategy through the centralization of management and the possibility of introducing cost-effective measures.This article emphasizes that accounting practices of the day and the valuation of goodwill, in particular, largely explain the success of the merger.

AB - In this article, I review some explanations for the Great Merger Movement (1895–1904) in the United States and confront these using the particularities of one of the prominent companies figuring in this movement: the American Cotton Oil Company. Subsequently, I argue that the literature on the Great Merger Movement by the commentators of the last 50 years may be complemented with an explanation that includes the dynamics of vertical integration, stressing patents and trademarks as protective measures in the transition of the company. As the American Cotton Oil Company case illustrates, the merger process can be explained, at least partially, as a defensive strategy through the centralization of management and the possibility of introducing cost-effective measures.This article emphasizes that accounting practices of the day and the valuation of goodwill, in particular, largely explain the success of the merger.

KW - American cotton oil company

KW - Merger movement

KW - Patents

KW - Trademarks

KW - Transition

KW - Vertical integration

U2 - 10.1177/1744935906071911

DO - 10.1177/1744935906071911

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 385

EP - 399

JO - Management and Organizational History

JF - Management and Organizational History

SN - 1744-9359

IS - 4

ER -