The Transcription and Representation of Spoken Political Discourse in the UK House of Commons

Michael Cribb, Shivani Rochford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper considers the representation of spoken political discourse through the transcription practices of the House of Commons. It considers how the Hansard method of transcription represents the oral debates during the weekly parliamentary sessions of Prime Minister’s questions in three areas: lexical and grammatical fidelity, performance characteristics and interruptions from the audience. The paper also considers how accurately and faithfully speakers in the House quote from Hansard during these sessions as they pursue their arguments. The findings suggest that while Hansard does what it purports to do, modern transcription methods and digital representations necessitate additional tools to augment this system. We argue the case for a more representational, multi-tool approach to the transcription of discourse.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of English Linguistics
Volume8
Issue number2
Early online date23 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

discourse
minister
performance
Political Discourse
Transcription
House of Commons
Interruption
Performance Characteristics
Discourse
Parliamentary
Fidelity

Keywords

  • political discourse
  • transcription
  • Hansard
  • representation
  • quotation
  • , prime minister’s questions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The Transcription and Representation of Spoken Political Discourse in the UK House of Commons. / Cribb, Michael; Rochford, Shivani.

In: International Journal of English Linguistics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1, 01.04.2018, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ffeec6d2a8ff49f785fab27a0582a856,
title = "The Transcription and Representation of Spoken Political Discourse in the UK House of Commons",
abstract = "This paper considers the representation of spoken political discourse through the transcription practices of the House of Commons. It considers how the Hansard method of transcription represents the oral debates during the weekly parliamentary sessions of Prime Minister’s questions in three areas: lexical and grammatical fidelity, performance characteristics and interruptions from the audience. The paper also considers how accurately and faithfully speakers in the House quote from Hansard during these sessions as they pursue their arguments. The findings suggest that while Hansard does what it purports to do, modern transcription methods and digital representations necessitate additional tools to augment this system. We argue the case for a more representational, multi-tool approach to the transcription of discourse.",
keywords = "political discourse, transcription, Hansard, representation, quotation, , prime minister’s questions",
author = "Michael Cribb and Shivani Rochford",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5539/ijel.v8n2p1",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "International Journal of English Linguistics",
issn = "1923-869X",
publisher = "Canadian Center of Science and Education",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Transcription and Representation of Spoken Political Discourse in the UK House of Commons

AU - Cribb, Michael

AU - Rochford, Shivani

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - This paper considers the representation of spoken political discourse through the transcription practices of the House of Commons. It considers how the Hansard method of transcription represents the oral debates during the weekly parliamentary sessions of Prime Minister’s questions in three areas: lexical and grammatical fidelity, performance characteristics and interruptions from the audience. The paper also considers how accurately and faithfully speakers in the House quote from Hansard during these sessions as they pursue their arguments. The findings suggest that while Hansard does what it purports to do, modern transcription methods and digital representations necessitate additional tools to augment this system. We argue the case for a more representational, multi-tool approach to the transcription of discourse.

AB - This paper considers the representation of spoken political discourse through the transcription practices of the House of Commons. It considers how the Hansard method of transcription represents the oral debates during the weekly parliamentary sessions of Prime Minister’s questions in three areas: lexical and grammatical fidelity, performance characteristics and interruptions from the audience. The paper also considers how accurately and faithfully speakers in the House quote from Hansard during these sessions as they pursue their arguments. The findings suggest that while Hansard does what it purports to do, modern transcription methods and digital representations necessitate additional tools to augment this system. We argue the case for a more representational, multi-tool approach to the transcription of discourse.

KW - political discourse

KW - transcription

KW - Hansard

KW - representation

KW - quotation

KW - , prime minister’s questions

U2 - 10.5539/ijel.v8n2p1

DO - 10.5539/ijel.v8n2p1

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - International Journal of English Linguistics

JF - International Journal of English Linguistics

SN - 1923-869X

IS - 2

M1 - 1

ER -