The 'Summer of Discontent': Exclusion and Communal Resistance at the London 2012 Olympics

Mike Duignan, Ilaria Pappalepore, Sally Everett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

London 2012 promised local small businesses access to lucrative
Olympic event-tourism and visitor trading opportunities. However, as
urban spaces were transformed to stage live Games, many local
stakeholders found themselves locked out. We focus on one 'host'
community, Central Greenwich, who emerged negatively impacted by such
conditions. 43 in-depth interviews and secondary evidence reveal that
this was a community determined to resist. Few papers have extended the
concept of resistance to the context of mega-events so we examine why
communities resisted, and how physical tactics and creative resistance
were deployed. Although efforts afforded some access for local businesses
- they proved too little, too late. We develop and present a 'tactics for
resistance' approach, a series of 'hard' and 'soft' tactics businesses
could use to encourage proactive, as opposed to reactive, communal
resistance required to protect local interests and afford access to
opportunities generated by temporary mega-event visitor economies
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-367
Number of pages13
JournalTourism Management
Volume70
Early online date15 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Olympic Games
tactics
exclusion
event
summer
Industry
tourism
small business
community
Tourism
economy
interview
evidence
Exclusion
Tactics
Olympics
Mega-events

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Tourism Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Tourism Management, vol.70, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.029

© 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Keywords

  • Communal resistance
  • Exclusion
  • Hard and soft tactics
  • Host community
  • London 2012
  • Mega-event
  • Olympic tourism
  • Small businesses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Transportation
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

The 'Summer of Discontent': Exclusion and Communal Resistance at the London 2012 Olympics. / Duignan, Mike; Pappalepore, Ilaria; Everett, Sally.

In: Tourism Management, Vol. 70, 02.2019, p. 355-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c4d6a4b213e149a5a6708d191c38c16c,
title = "The 'Summer of Discontent': Exclusion and Communal Resistance at the London 2012 Olympics",
abstract = "London 2012 promised local small businesses access to lucrativeOlympic event-tourism and visitor trading opportunities. However, asurban spaces were transformed to stage live Games, many localstakeholders found themselves locked out. We focus on one 'host'community, Central Greenwich, who emerged negatively impacted by suchconditions. 43 in-depth interviews and secondary evidence reveal thatthis was a community determined to resist. Few papers have extended theconcept of resistance to the context of mega-events so we examine whycommunities resisted, and how physical tactics and creative resistancewere deployed. Although efforts afforded some access for local businesses- they proved too little, too late. We develop and present a 'tactics forresistance' approach, a series of 'hard' and 'soft' tactics businessescould use to encourage proactive, as opposed to reactive, communalresistance required to protect local interests and afford access toopportunities generated by temporary mega-event visitor economies",
keywords = "Communal resistance, Exclusion, Hard and soft tactics, Host community, London 2012, Mega-event, Olympic tourism, Small businesses",
author = "Mike Duignan and Ilaria Pappalepore and Sally Everett",
note = "NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Tourism Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Tourism Management, vol.70, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.029 {\circledC} 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.029",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "355--367",
journal = "Tourism Management",
issn = "0261-5177",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 'Summer of Discontent': Exclusion and Communal Resistance at the London 2012 Olympics

AU - Duignan, Mike

AU - Pappalepore, Ilaria

AU - Everett, Sally

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Tourism Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Tourism Management, vol.70, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.029 © 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - London 2012 promised local small businesses access to lucrativeOlympic event-tourism and visitor trading opportunities. However, asurban spaces were transformed to stage live Games, many localstakeholders found themselves locked out. We focus on one 'host'community, Central Greenwich, who emerged negatively impacted by suchconditions. 43 in-depth interviews and secondary evidence reveal thatthis was a community determined to resist. Few papers have extended theconcept of resistance to the context of mega-events so we examine whycommunities resisted, and how physical tactics and creative resistancewere deployed. Although efforts afforded some access for local businesses- they proved too little, too late. We develop and present a 'tactics forresistance' approach, a series of 'hard' and 'soft' tactics businessescould use to encourage proactive, as opposed to reactive, communalresistance required to protect local interests and afford access toopportunities generated by temporary mega-event visitor economies

AB - London 2012 promised local small businesses access to lucrativeOlympic event-tourism and visitor trading opportunities. However, asurban spaces were transformed to stage live Games, many localstakeholders found themselves locked out. We focus on one 'host'community, Central Greenwich, who emerged negatively impacted by suchconditions. 43 in-depth interviews and secondary evidence reveal thatthis was a community determined to resist. Few papers have extended theconcept of resistance to the context of mega-events so we examine whycommunities resisted, and how physical tactics and creative resistancewere deployed. Although efforts afforded some access for local businesses- they proved too little, too late. We develop and present a 'tactics forresistance' approach, a series of 'hard' and 'soft' tactics businessescould use to encourage proactive, as opposed to reactive, communalresistance required to protect local interests and afford access toopportunities generated by temporary mega-event visitor economies

KW - Communal resistance

KW - Exclusion

KW - Hard and soft tactics

KW - Host community

KW - London 2012

KW - Mega-event

KW - Olympic tourism

KW - Small businesses

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053410955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.029

DO - 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.029

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 355

EP - 367

JO - Tourism Management

JF - Tourism Management

SN - 0261-5177

ER -