The sharing of ballistics data across Europe and neighbouring territories

Jeane Gerard; Rebecca Crookes; Sue Elliott; Mike Hellenbach; Thanos Stamos; Helen Poole; Erica Bowen

doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.010

The sharing of ballistics data across Europe and neighbouring territories

Jeane Gerard, Rebecca Crookes, Sue Elliott, Mike Hellenbach, Thanos Stamos, Helen Poole, Erica Bowen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

662 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The current study explored the use of ballistic examinations and cross-border information sharing across 14 European countries. The presented data were collected using a mixed methods technique consisting of semi-structured interviews and questionnaires that were completed by participants. The results painted a very heterogeneous picture of the use of automated ballistic systems across these countries, as well as how ballistic analyses are integrated in the fight against gun-enabled crime. Three super-ordinates themes emerged from the thematic analysis: use of automated ballistic systems; Ballistic evidence recovery and analysis; knowledge exchange and best practices. The ability to draw firm conclusions regarding the value of ballistics comparison systems, either on a national or cross-border basis, is hampered by inconsistencies regarding data recording practices and definitions. Therefore, key recommendations are suggested to establish better cross border cooperation between member states and develop a better understanding of data sharing procedures.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	384-393
Number of pages	10
Journal	Science & Justice
Volume	57
Issue number	5
Early online date	1 May 2017
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.010
Publication status	Published - Sept 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Science and Justice. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Science and Justice, [(in press) (2017)] DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.010

© 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Keywords

Firearm
Ballistic evidence sharing
European ballistic database
Open case file
Cross-border comparison

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.010

Post-PrintAccepted author manuscript, 677 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{9e76fc5c3a8c45a597ee0c453287aa24,

title = "The sharing of ballistics data across Europe and neighbouring territories",

abstract = "The current study explored the use of ballistic examinations and cross-border information sharing across 14 European countries. The presented data were collected using a mixed methods technique consisting of semi-structured interviews and questionnaires that were completed by participants. The results painted a very heterogeneous picture of the use of automated ballistic systems across these countries, as well as how ballistic analyses are integrated in the fight against gun-enabled crime. Three super-ordinates themes emerged from the thematic analysis: use of automated ballistic systems; Ballistic evidence recovery and analysis; knowledge exchange and best practices. The ability to draw firm conclusions regarding the value of ballistics comparison systems, either on a national or cross-border basis, is hampered by inconsistencies regarding data recording practices and definitions. Therefore, key recommendations are suggested to establish better cross border cooperation between member states and develop a better understanding of data sharing procedures.",

keywords = "Firearm, Ballistic evidence sharing, European ballistic database, Open case file, Cross-border comparison",

author = "Jeane Gerard and Rebecca Crookes and Sue Elliott and Mike Hellenbach and Thanos Stamos and Helen Poole and Erica Bowen",

note = "Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Science and Justice. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Science and Justice, [(in press) (2017)] DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.010 {\textcopyright} 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",

year = "2017",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.010",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "384--393",

journal = "Science & Justice",

issn = "1876-4452",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The sharing of ballistics data across Europe and neighbouring territories

AU - Gerard, Jeane

AU - Crookes, Rebecca

AU - Elliott, Sue

AU - Hellenbach, Mike

AU - Stamos, Thanos

AU - Poole, Helen

AU - Bowen, Erica

N1 - Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Science and Justice. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Science and Justice, [(in press) (2017)] DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.010 © 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - The current study explored the use of ballistic examinations and cross-border information sharing across 14 European countries. The presented data were collected using a mixed methods technique consisting of semi-structured interviews and questionnaires that were completed by participants. The results painted a very heterogeneous picture of the use of automated ballistic systems across these countries, as well as how ballistic analyses are integrated in the fight against gun-enabled crime. Three super-ordinates themes emerged from the thematic analysis: use of automated ballistic systems; Ballistic evidence recovery and analysis; knowledge exchange and best practices. The ability to draw firm conclusions regarding the value of ballistics comparison systems, either on a national or cross-border basis, is hampered by inconsistencies regarding data recording practices and definitions. Therefore, key recommendations are suggested to establish better cross border cooperation between member states and develop a better understanding of data sharing procedures.

AB - The current study explored the use of ballistic examinations and cross-border information sharing across 14 European countries. The presented data were collected using a mixed methods technique consisting of semi-structured interviews and questionnaires that were completed by participants. The results painted a very heterogeneous picture of the use of automated ballistic systems across these countries, as well as how ballistic analyses are integrated in the fight against gun-enabled crime. Three super-ordinates themes emerged from the thematic analysis: use of automated ballistic systems; Ballistic evidence recovery and analysis; knowledge exchange and best practices. The ability to draw firm conclusions regarding the value of ballistics comparison systems, either on a national or cross-border basis, is hampered by inconsistencies regarding data recording practices and definitions. Therefore, key recommendations are suggested to establish better cross border cooperation between member states and develop a better understanding of data sharing procedures.

KW - Firearm

KW - Ballistic evidence sharing

KW - European ballistic database

KW - Open case file

KW - Cross-border comparison

U2 - 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.010

DO - 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.010

M3 - Article

SN - 1876-4452

VL - 57

SP - 384

EP - 393

JO - Science & Justice

JF - Science & Justice

IS - 5

ER -

The sharing of ballistics data across Europe and neighbouring territories

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this