Abstract
The growth of urban agriculture (UA) has raised the awareness of city officials and civil society organizations of its potential effects on food systems. This has led to various policies to regulate and support UA. This research characterizes existing food, energy and water (FEW nexus) policies based on policy data from five case study cities in Europe and the U.S. (Dortmund, Gorzów Wielkopolski, London, Nantes, and New York City) to analyze their relationships to UA, and to identify policy types that support resource-efficient UA. The paper presents the results of an analysis of 78 policy documents related to UA and the FEW nexus, and the results of a Q-sort ranking by UA policy experts on the effectiveness of 16 generalized UA policies in promoting resource-efficient UA. The number, type, and degree of support for nexus policies vary among the five case studies. The results show that the majority of policies (36) are implemented at the local scale, that few policies (19) incorporate all elements of the nexus, yet many nexus policies include UA indirectly. Regulations are more prevalent and are considered more effective at ensuring resource-efficient UA than incentives or awareness-raising policies. The study offers guidance to policy makers who want to improve resource use in future UA pointing at the increasing importance of local food policies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 104848 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Landscape and Urban Planning |
Volume | 239 |
Early online date | 3 Aug 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2023 |
Bibliographical note
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)Funder
We would like to thank the following policy stakeholders France, Germany, Poland, the UK and the US who supported this research with taking part in the ranking of the generalized policies: Veronica Berry, Birmingham City University CEBE, UK; Julien Blouin; CEO WE AGRI, Urbanist & Urban Farming Expert, FR; Werner Heidemann, LWL, DE; Gary Mitchell, Social Farms and Gardens, UK; Natalia Marcinkiewicz, Urząd Miasta Gorzowa Wielkopolskiego, PL; Christine Margetic, UMR 6590 CNRS ESO, FR; Martin Sondermann, Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft ARL; Sarah Williams, SUSTAIN, UK; Deirdre “Dee” Woods, London Food Board, UK; Agnieszka Zdunek, Pracownia Boruja, PL and five other interviewees (a scientist, two representatives of municipalities and two representatives of NGOs) who preferred to stay anonymous. This paper is based on FEW-meter project, funded by ESRC, UK, grant number ES/S002170/2; by BMBF: Germany, grant number 01LF1801A; by ANR: France, grant number ANR-17-SUGI-0001-01; by NSF: USA, Belmont Forum 18929627; by NCN: Poland, grant no 2017/25/Z/HS4/ 03048; and by European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (GA No 730254) under the JPI Urban Europe's call “SUGI - FWE Nexus”. The German-American Fulbright Commission also provided support for this project for Caitlin Kirby.This paper is based on FEW-meter project, funded by ESRC, UK, grant number ES/S002170/2; by BMBF: Germany, grant number 01LF1801A; by ANR: France, grant number ANR-17-SUGI-0001-01; by NSF: USA, Belmont Forum 18929627; by NCN: Poland, grant no 2017/25/Z/HS4/ 03048; and by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (GA No 730254) under the JPI Urban Europe’s call “SUGI - FWE Nexus”. The German-American Fulbright Commission also provided support for this project for Caitlin Kirby.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
Keywords
- Food-energy-water nexus
- Nexus-related policies
- Policy effectiveness ranking
- Resource use
- Urban agriculture
- Urban policy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology
- Urban Studies
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law