THE ROLE OF RADICAL REFLEXIVITY IN ACADEMICS’ MEANING-MAKING OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT

Sophie Mills, Amanda Lee

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the role of “radical reflexivity” in the way academics make meaning of their career development (CD) choices and prospects within the contested power relationships of higher education (HE). The wider pervading managerialist academic landscape provides the context within which our research is embedded and labour process theory (LPT) is drawn on as an underpinning theoretical framework, and this is discussed in the next section. The chapter moves on to outline academic perspectives on reflexivity and radical reflexivity, and to consider the relevance of these in the development and management of academic careers. We (the authors) have made reference to our previous research relating to academics within the UK “new university” (also referred to as “post-’92 university”) environment. We have also included our personal reflections of being academics based in a UK new university as a means of introducing our own reflexivity and radical reflexivity within this context. We argue this demonstrates some form of “double hermeneutic”, or our “interpretation of the experience of both the participant and the researcher” (Leary et al. 2010, 58), and acknowledgement of our identification with the focus of our research. Cunliffe (2003, 983) proposes that rad
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRealising Critical HRD Stories of Reflecting, Voicing, and Enacting Critical Practice
EditorsJamie L. Callahan, Jim Stewart, Clare Rigg, Sally Sambrook, Kiran Trehan
Place of PublicationNewcastle-upon-Tyne
PublisherCambridge Scholars Publishing
ISBN (Print)978-1-4438-8020-6, 1-4438-8020-5
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2015

Fingerprint

reflexivity
career
university
hermeneutics
labor
management
education
experience

Bibliographical note

The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.

Cite this

Mills, S., & Lee, A. (2015). THE ROLE OF RADICAL REFLEXIVITY IN ACADEMICS’ MEANING-MAKING OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT. In J. L. Callahan, J. Stewart, C. Rigg, S. Sambrook, & K. Trehan (Eds.), Realising Critical HRD Stories of Reflecting, Voicing, and Enacting Critical Practice Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

THE ROLE OF RADICAL REFLEXIVITY IN ACADEMICS’ MEANING-MAKING OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT. / Mills, Sophie; Lee, Amanda.

Realising Critical HRD Stories of Reflecting, Voicing, and Enacting Critical Practice. ed. / Jamie L. Callahan; Jim Stewart; Clare Rigg; Sally Sambrook; Kiran Trehan. Newcastle-upon-Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Mills, S & Lee, A 2015, THE ROLE OF RADICAL REFLEXIVITY IN ACADEMICS’ MEANING-MAKING OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT. in JL Callahan, J Stewart, C Rigg, S Sambrook & K Trehan (eds), Realising Critical HRD Stories of Reflecting, Voicing, and Enacting Critical Practice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
Mills S, Lee A. THE ROLE OF RADICAL REFLEXIVITY IN ACADEMICS’ MEANING-MAKING OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT. In Callahan JL, Stewart J, Rigg C, Sambrook S, Trehan K, editors, Realising Critical HRD Stories of Reflecting, Voicing, and Enacting Critical Practice. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 2015
Mills, Sophie ; Lee, Amanda. / THE ROLE OF RADICAL REFLEXIVITY IN ACADEMICS’ MEANING-MAKING OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT. Realising Critical HRD Stories of Reflecting, Voicing, and Enacting Critical Practice. editor / Jamie L. Callahan ; Jim Stewart ; Clare Rigg ; Sally Sambrook ; Kiran Trehan. Newcastle-upon-Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015.
@inbook{435fa8da200c45d690a46749e72e1f67,
title = "THE ROLE OF RADICAL REFLEXIVITY IN ACADEMICS’ MEANING-MAKING OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT",
abstract = "This chapter explores the role of “radical reflexivity” in the way academics make meaning of their career development (CD) choices and prospects within the contested power relationships of higher education (HE). The wider pervading managerialist academic landscape provides the context within which our research is embedded and labour process theory (LPT) is drawn on as an underpinning theoretical framework, and this is discussed in the next section. The chapter moves on to outline academic perspectives on reflexivity and radical reflexivity, and to consider the relevance of these in the development and management of academic careers. We (the authors) have made reference to our previous research relating to academics within the UK “new university” (also referred to as “post-’92 university”) environment. We have also included our personal reflections of being academics based in a UK new university as a means of introducing our own reflexivity and radical reflexivity within this context. We argue this demonstrates some form of “double hermeneutic”, or our “interpretation of the experience of both the participant and the researcher” (Leary et al. 2010, 58), and acknowledgement of our identification with the focus of our research. Cunliffe (2003, 983) proposes that rad",
author = "Sophie Mills and Amanda Lee",
note = "The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-4438-8020-6",
editor = "Callahan, {Jamie L.} and Jim Stewart and Clare Rigg and Sally Sambrook and Kiran Trehan",
booktitle = "Realising Critical HRD Stories of Reflecting, Voicing, and Enacting Critical Practice",
publisher = "Cambridge Scholars Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - THE ROLE OF RADICAL REFLEXIVITY IN ACADEMICS’ MEANING-MAKING OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT

AU - Mills, Sophie

AU - Lee, Amanda

N1 - The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - This chapter explores the role of “radical reflexivity” in the way academics make meaning of their career development (CD) choices and prospects within the contested power relationships of higher education (HE). The wider pervading managerialist academic landscape provides the context within which our research is embedded and labour process theory (LPT) is drawn on as an underpinning theoretical framework, and this is discussed in the next section. The chapter moves on to outline academic perspectives on reflexivity and radical reflexivity, and to consider the relevance of these in the development and management of academic careers. We (the authors) have made reference to our previous research relating to academics within the UK “new university” (also referred to as “post-’92 university”) environment. We have also included our personal reflections of being academics based in a UK new university as a means of introducing our own reflexivity and radical reflexivity within this context. We argue this demonstrates some form of “double hermeneutic”, or our “interpretation of the experience of both the participant and the researcher” (Leary et al. 2010, 58), and acknowledgement of our identification with the focus of our research. Cunliffe (2003, 983) proposes that rad

AB - This chapter explores the role of “radical reflexivity” in the way academics make meaning of their career development (CD) choices and prospects within the contested power relationships of higher education (HE). The wider pervading managerialist academic landscape provides the context within which our research is embedded and labour process theory (LPT) is drawn on as an underpinning theoretical framework, and this is discussed in the next section. The chapter moves on to outline academic perspectives on reflexivity and radical reflexivity, and to consider the relevance of these in the development and management of academic careers. We (the authors) have made reference to our previous research relating to academics within the UK “new university” (also referred to as “post-’92 university”) environment. We have also included our personal reflections of being academics based in a UK new university as a means of introducing our own reflexivity and radical reflexivity within this context. We argue this demonstrates some form of “double hermeneutic”, or our “interpretation of the experience of both the participant and the researcher” (Leary et al. 2010, 58), and acknowledgement of our identification with the focus of our research. Cunliffe (2003, 983) proposes that rad

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-4438-8020-6

SN - 1-4438-8020-5

BT - Realising Critical HRD Stories of Reflecting, Voicing, and Enacting Critical Practice

A2 - Callahan, Jamie L.

A2 - Stewart, Jim

A2 - Rigg, Clare

A2 - Sambrook, Sally

A2 - Trehan, Kiran

PB - Cambridge Scholars Publishing

CY - Newcastle-upon-Tyne

ER -