THE ROLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN SENTENCING REPEAT THEFT OFFENDERS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

277 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article considers the role of proportionality in sentencing repeat offenders for offences which do not carry a mandatory minimum sentence for the second or third transgression. It is based on the results of a wider study on sentencing practice in theft cases, and considers the role of prior record at the sentencing stage, in particular the extent to which previous convictions may override proportionality constraints. It also explores the extent to which the current sentencing regime as contained in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 may have impacted on sentencing practice in relation to previous convictions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-174
JournalContemporary Issues In Law
Volume13
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

previous conviction
proportionality
larceny
offender
repeat offender
justice
act
offense
regime

Bibliographical note

This article has been accepted for publication in Contemporary Issues In Law. Published by Lawtext Publishing Limited. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0

Cite this

THE ROLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN SENTENCING REPEAT THEFT OFFENDERS. / Betts, Gary.

In: Contemporary Issues In Law, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2015, p. 155-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a5aa51ddd2eb487badaa8fdbe65570e7,
title = "THE ROLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN SENTENCING REPEAT THEFT OFFENDERS",
abstract = "This article considers the role of proportionality in sentencing repeat offenders for offences which do not carry a mandatory minimum sentence for the second or third transgression. It is based on the results of a wider study on sentencing practice in theft cases, and considers the role of prior record at the sentencing stage, in particular the extent to which previous convictions may override proportionality constraints. It also explores the extent to which the current sentencing regime as contained in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 may have impacted on sentencing practice in relation to previous convictions.",
author = "Gary Betts",
note = "This article has been accepted for publication in Contemporary Issues In Law. Published by Lawtext Publishing Limited. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "155--174",
journal = "Contemporary Issues In Law",
issn = "1357-0374",
publisher = "Lawtext Publishing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - THE ROLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN SENTENCING REPEAT THEFT OFFENDERS

AU - Betts, Gary

N1 - This article has been accepted for publication in Contemporary Issues In Law. Published by Lawtext Publishing Limited. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article considers the role of proportionality in sentencing repeat offenders for offences which do not carry a mandatory minimum sentence for the second or third transgression. It is based on the results of a wider study on sentencing practice in theft cases, and considers the role of prior record at the sentencing stage, in particular the extent to which previous convictions may override proportionality constraints. It also explores the extent to which the current sentencing regime as contained in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 may have impacted on sentencing practice in relation to previous convictions.

AB - This article considers the role of proportionality in sentencing repeat offenders for offences which do not carry a mandatory minimum sentence for the second or third transgression. It is based on the results of a wider study on sentencing practice in theft cases, and considers the role of prior record at the sentencing stage, in particular the extent to which previous convictions may override proportionality constraints. It also explores the extent to which the current sentencing regime as contained in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 may have impacted on sentencing practice in relation to previous convictions.

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 155

EP - 174

JO - Contemporary Issues In Law

JF - Contemporary Issues In Law

SN - 1357-0374

IS - 3

ER -