Abstract
As an institution, the United States Supreme Court carries out three duties (van Geel 2001). Firstly, it settles disputes between parties. As the highest appellate court in the federal judicial system, it reviews the decisions of inferior federal courts for errors of law, and it also reviews constitutional issues raised in both federal and state courts. Secondly, by ruling on what is constitutionally permissible, the Supreme Court affects public policy. Lastly, by offering an explanation as to why a specific conduct has been considered constitutionally permissible or impermissible, the Court educates the general public on acceptable and unacceptable behaviour. In fact, Supreme Court decisions are often used as an educational tool in the law classroom to illustrate certain points of law and to aid students in developing skills of legal reasoning.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Power, Persuasion and Manipulation in Specialised Genres |
| Subtitle of host publication | Providing Keys to the Rhetoric of Professional Communities |
| Editors | Maria Angeles Orts Llopis, Ruth Breeze, Maurizio Gotti |
| Publisher | Peter Lang |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783034330121 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783034330121 |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Publication series
| Name | Linguistic Insights |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Peter Lang |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Legal discourse
- Judicial opinions
- Dissents
- Corpus linguistics
- hedging
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Role of Hedging in Balancing Power and Persuasion in the Judicial Context: The case of majority and dissenting opinions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS