The Role of Hedging in Balancing Power and Persuasion in the Judicial Context: The case of majority and dissenting opinions

Holly Vass

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    As an institution, the United States Supreme Court carries out three duties (van Geel 2001). Firstly, it settles disputes between parties. As the highest appellate court in the federal judicial system, it reviews the decisions of inferior federal courts for errors of law, and it also reviews constitutional issues raised in both federal and state courts. Secondly, by ruling on what is constitutionally permissible, the Supreme Court affects public policy. Lastly, by offering an explanation as to why a specific conduct has been considered constitutionally permissible or impermissible, the Court educates the general public on acceptable and unacceptable behaviour. In fact, Supreme Court decisions are often used as an educational tool in the law classroom to illustrate certain points of law and to aid students in developing skills of legal reasoning.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationPower, Persuasion and Manipulation in Specialised Genres
    Subtitle of host publicationProviding Keys to the Rhetoric of Professional Communities
    EditorsMaria Angeles Orts Llopis, Ruth Breeze, Maurizio Gotti
    PublisherPeter Lang
    ISBN (Electronic)9783034330121
    ISBN (Print)9783034330121
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Publication series

    NameLinguistic Insights
    PublisherPeter Lang

    Keywords

    • Legal discourse
    • Judicial opinions
    • Dissents
    • Corpus linguistics
    • hedging

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Arts and Humanities

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Role of Hedging in Balancing Power and Persuasion in the Judicial Context: The case of majority and dissenting opinions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this