The role of expertise in dynamic risk assessment: A reflection of the problem-solving strategies used by experienced fireground commanders

Justin Okoli, J. Watt, G. Weller, W. B. L. Wong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although the concept of dynamic risk assessment has in recent times become more topical in the training manuals of most high-risk domains, only a few empirical studies have reported how experts actually carry out this crucial task. The knowledge gap between research and practice in this area, therefore, calls for more empirical investigation within the naturalistic environment. In this article, we present and discuss the problem-solving strategies employed by 16 experienced operational firefighters using a qualitative knowledge elicitation tool – the critical decision method. Findings revealed that dynamic risk assessment is not merely a process of weighing the risks of a proposed course of action against its benefits, but rather an experiential and pattern recognition process. The article concludes by discussing the implications of designing training curriculum for the less experienced officers using the elicited expert knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-25
JournalRisk Management
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Risk assessment
Expertise
Problem solving
Empirical investigation
Knowledge gap
Expert knowledge
Knowledge elicitation
Empirical study
Curriculum
Pattern recognition

Bibliographical note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/rm.2015.20

Keywords

  • dynamic risk assessment
  • experts
  • firefighting
  • decision making
  • pattern-recognition
  • training

Cite this

The role of expertise in dynamic risk assessment: A reflection of the problem-solving strategies used by experienced fireground commanders. / Okoli, Justin; Watt, J.; Weller, G.; Wong, W. B. L.

In: Risk Management, Vol. 18, No. 1, 22.01.2016, p. 4-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a49685fb740494486104df779eb95bb,
title = "The role of expertise in dynamic risk assessment: A reflection of the problem-solving strategies used by experienced fireground commanders",
abstract = "Although the concept of dynamic risk assessment has in recent times become more topical in the training manuals of most high-risk domains, only a few empirical studies have reported how experts actually carry out this crucial task. The knowledge gap between research and practice in this area, therefore, calls for more empirical investigation within the naturalistic environment. In this article, we present and discuss the problem-solving strategies employed by 16 experienced operational firefighters using a qualitative knowledge elicitation tool – the critical decision method. Findings revealed that dynamic risk assessment is not merely a process of weighing the risks of a proposed course of action against its benefits, but rather an experiential and pattern recognition process. The article concludes by discussing the implications of designing training curriculum for the less experienced officers using the elicited expert knowledge.",
keywords = "dynamic risk assessment, experts, firefighting, decision making, pattern-recognition, training",
author = "Justin Okoli and J. Watt and G. Weller and Wong, {W. B. L.}",
note = "The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/rm.2015.20",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1057/rm.2015.20",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "4--25",
journal = "Risk Management",
issn = "1460-3799",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of expertise in dynamic risk assessment: A reflection of the problem-solving strategies used by experienced fireground commanders

AU - Okoli, Justin

AU - Watt, J.

AU - Weller, G.

AU - Wong, W. B. L.

N1 - The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/rm.2015.20

PY - 2016/1/22

Y1 - 2016/1/22

N2 - Although the concept of dynamic risk assessment has in recent times become more topical in the training manuals of most high-risk domains, only a few empirical studies have reported how experts actually carry out this crucial task. The knowledge gap between research and practice in this area, therefore, calls for more empirical investigation within the naturalistic environment. In this article, we present and discuss the problem-solving strategies employed by 16 experienced operational firefighters using a qualitative knowledge elicitation tool – the critical decision method. Findings revealed that dynamic risk assessment is not merely a process of weighing the risks of a proposed course of action against its benefits, but rather an experiential and pattern recognition process. The article concludes by discussing the implications of designing training curriculum for the less experienced officers using the elicited expert knowledge.

AB - Although the concept of dynamic risk assessment has in recent times become more topical in the training manuals of most high-risk domains, only a few empirical studies have reported how experts actually carry out this crucial task. The knowledge gap between research and practice in this area, therefore, calls for more empirical investigation within the naturalistic environment. In this article, we present and discuss the problem-solving strategies employed by 16 experienced operational firefighters using a qualitative knowledge elicitation tool – the critical decision method. Findings revealed that dynamic risk assessment is not merely a process of weighing the risks of a proposed course of action against its benefits, but rather an experiential and pattern recognition process. The article concludes by discussing the implications of designing training curriculum for the less experienced officers using the elicited expert knowledge.

KW - dynamic risk assessment

KW - experts

KW - firefighting

KW - decision making

KW - pattern-recognition

KW - training

U2 - 10.1057/rm.2015.20

DO - 10.1057/rm.2015.20

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 4

EP - 25

JO - Risk Management

JF - Risk Management

SN - 1460-3799

IS - 1

ER -