Abstract
A common problem in art and design is that creative practice is often presented as
research under the label of practice-based or practice-led research. This problem arises
on the one hand from the wish of practitioners to use their creative practice in research,
and on the other from a persistent uncertainty about the role of creative practice in
relation to the requirement for making a contribution to knowledge within research.
In this paper, we discuss existing terminology and relate it to the different role(s) practice
can take within research with regard to the contribution of knowledge. To this end, we
analyse and categorise existing terminology concerning different roles of practice. We
then examine how practice can be used in research in valid and rigorous ways. We thus
aim to provide an important basis for the further development of the debate on research
in art and design
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Event | 2007 IASDR Conference: Emerging Trends in Design Research - , Hong Kong Duration: 12 Nov 2007 → 15 Nov 2007 |
Conference
Conference | 2007 IASDR Conference |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Hong Kong |
Period | 12/11/07 → 15/11/07 |
Bibliographical note
This paper can be viewed in full text at: http://niedderer.org/IASDR07SRS.pdf. The paper was given at the2007 IASDR Conference : Emerging Trends in Design Research, November 12 -15 2007, Hong-Kong
Keywords
- Research methodology
- practice-based research
- knowledge contribution