The Rise of Referendums: Demystifying Direct Democracy

Matt Qvortrup

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    41 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Referendums have been portrayed as a favorite tool of populists and autocratic leaders. The empirical evidence, however, does not support this reading. The total number of plebiscites in dictatorships has fallen. Well-functioning constitutional constraints, rather than populist agitation, have been the driving forces behind many referendums in democracies. Further, where populist leaders have pushed for referendums, the resulting votes have not generally gone in their favor. The referendum has generally been a mechanism for strengthening democracy, a people’s shield even when governments have attempted to wield it as a sword.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number1
    Pages (from-to)141-152
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Democracy
    Volume28
    Issue number3
    Early online date3 Mar 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017

    Keywords

    • Referendums
    • Plebiscites
    • Constitutionalism
    • Direct Democracy

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Social Sciences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Rise of Referendums: Demystifying Direct Democracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this