The resilient state: new regulatory modes in international approaches to state building?

Jan Pospisil, Florian P. Kühn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)


‘Resilience’ has quickly risen to prominence in international security and development circles. In recent years it has found its way into political discourse on state building and state fragility, triggering a vast but often conceptually indistinct examination of the subject. Given its meaning in policy publications and guidelines, ‘resilience’ tends to eschew a static conceptualisation of statehood, turning instead to a more dynamic, complex and process-oriented rendering of state–society relations. This illustrates a conceptual shift from ‘failed states’ to ‘fragile states and situations’. It also transforms the concept of ‘failed state’ as a mere threat perception – with ‘stability’ as its logical other – into ‘fragility’ as a particular form of social and political risk. This paper analyses the concepts in 43 policy papers, focusing on the nexus of ‘resilience’ and ‘fragility’ in international state building, and assesses potential consequences. What does ‘resilience’ – as the opposite vision to ‘fragility’ – in fact mean? What is the practice derived from this chimerical state of states?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalThird World Quarterly
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2016
Externally publishedYes


  • fragile states
  • Resilience
  • failed states
  • security
  • state-building policy


Dive into the research topics of 'The resilient state: new regulatory modes in international approaches to state building?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this