The reality of school development planning in the effective primary school: Technicist or guiding plan?

Nigel Bennett, Megan Crawford, Rosalind Levačić, Derek Glover, Peter Earley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which the technicist-rational approach to school development planning, advocated by OfSTED inspection guidelines, is appropriate for primary schools. The issue is investigated through case studies of nine primary schools, deemed by OfSTED to be educationally effective and efficient. The external pressures on schools to adopt a technicist-rational approach to management have been intensified by application of the OfSTED inspection guidelines. The school development plan and its implementation now form a crucial part of the evidence which inspectors use to judge the management and efficiency of the school. Schools that are deemed educationally effective and efficient by OfSTED inspectors may therefore be expected to show high levels of technicist-rational planning. This was not found to be the case, and a more sophisticated typology of planning approaches, drawing on distinctions between strategic and development planning, and between technicist and guiding plan, is developed to accommodate the findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-351
Number of pages19
JournalSchool Leadership and Management
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

school development planning
primary school
school
planning
development planning
strategic planning
management
typology
efficiency
evidence
Primary school
Development planning
Primary School
Planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

The reality of school development planning in the effective primary school : Technicist or guiding plan? / Bennett, Nigel; Crawford, Megan; Levačić, Rosalind; Glover, Derek; Earley, Peter.

In: School Leadership and Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.01.2000, p. 333-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bennett, Nigel ; Crawford, Megan ; Levačić, Rosalind ; Glover, Derek ; Earley, Peter. / The reality of school development planning in the effective primary school : Technicist or guiding plan?. In: School Leadership and Management. 2000 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 333-351.
@article{83b98e75b76c4fe28ab20283b57e8194,
title = "The reality of school development planning in the effective primary school: Technicist or guiding plan?",
abstract = "This paper examines the extent to which the technicist-rational approach to school development planning, advocated by OfSTED inspection guidelines, is appropriate for primary schools. The issue is investigated through case studies of nine primary schools, deemed by OfSTED to be educationally effective and efficient. The external pressures on schools to adopt a technicist-rational approach to management have been intensified by application of the OfSTED inspection guidelines. The school development plan and its implementation now form a crucial part of the evidence which inspectors use to judge the management and efficiency of the school. Schools that are deemed educationally effective and efficient by OfSTED inspectors may therefore be expected to show high levels of technicist-rational planning. This was not found to be the case, and a more sophisticated typology of planning approaches, drawing on distinctions between strategic and development planning, and between technicist and guiding plan, is developed to accommodate the findings.",
author = "Nigel Bennett and Megan Crawford and Rosalind Levačić and Derek Glover and Peter Earley",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13632430050128354",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "333--351",
journal = "School Leadership and Management",
issn = "1363-2434",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reality of school development planning in the effective primary school

T2 - Technicist or guiding plan?

AU - Bennett, Nigel

AU - Crawford, Megan

AU - Levačić, Rosalind

AU - Glover, Derek

AU - Earley, Peter

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - This paper examines the extent to which the technicist-rational approach to school development planning, advocated by OfSTED inspection guidelines, is appropriate for primary schools. The issue is investigated through case studies of nine primary schools, deemed by OfSTED to be educationally effective and efficient. The external pressures on schools to adopt a technicist-rational approach to management have been intensified by application of the OfSTED inspection guidelines. The school development plan and its implementation now form a crucial part of the evidence which inspectors use to judge the management and efficiency of the school. Schools that are deemed educationally effective and efficient by OfSTED inspectors may therefore be expected to show high levels of technicist-rational planning. This was not found to be the case, and a more sophisticated typology of planning approaches, drawing on distinctions between strategic and development planning, and between technicist and guiding plan, is developed to accommodate the findings.

AB - This paper examines the extent to which the technicist-rational approach to school development planning, advocated by OfSTED inspection guidelines, is appropriate for primary schools. The issue is investigated through case studies of nine primary schools, deemed by OfSTED to be educationally effective and efficient. The external pressures on schools to adopt a technicist-rational approach to management have been intensified by application of the OfSTED inspection guidelines. The school development plan and its implementation now form a crucial part of the evidence which inspectors use to judge the management and efficiency of the school. Schools that are deemed educationally effective and efficient by OfSTED inspectors may therefore be expected to show high levels of technicist-rational planning. This was not found to be the case, and a more sophisticated typology of planning approaches, drawing on distinctions between strategic and development planning, and between technicist and guiding plan, is developed to accommodate the findings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55249092398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13632430050128354

DO - 10.1080/13632430050128354

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 333

EP - 351

JO - School Leadership and Management

JF - School Leadership and Management

SN - 1363-2434

IS - 3

ER -