The politics of evidence-based policy in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’

Martin Baldwin-Edwards, Brad Blitz, Heaven Crawley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increased migration across the Mediterranean to Europe during 2015 was associated with growing interest in generating new research evidence to assist policymakers in understanding the complexities of migration and improve policy responses. In the UK, this was reflected in funding by the Economic and Social Research Council for a Mediterranean Migration Research Programme. Drawing on evidence from the programme, this volume explores the nature of Europe’s ‘migration crisis’ and the extent to which the development of new migration management policies was grounded in evidence about the causes, drivers and consequences of migration to Europe. The authors conclude that there is a substantial ‘gap’ between the now significant body of evidence examining migration processes and European Union policy responses. This gap is attributed to three main factors: the long-standing ‘paradigm war’ in social research between positivist, interpretivist and critical approaches which means that what counts as ‘evidence’ is contested; competing knowledge claims associated with research and other forms of evidence used to construct and/or support policy narratives; and, perhaps most importantly, the politics of policymaking, which has resulted in policies based on underlying assumptions and vested interests rather than research evidence, even where this evidence is funded directly by European governments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2139-2155
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Volume45
Issue number12
Early online date30 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

migration
politics
evidence
social research
migration research
economic research
funding
driver
paradigm
narrative
cause
management
knowledge
Social Research

Keywords

  • Europe
  • evidence-based policy
  • migration
  • politics
  • research
  • Policy formulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The politics of evidence-based policy in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’. / Baldwin-Edwards, Martin; Blitz, Brad; Crawley, Heaven.

In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 45, No. 12, 10.09.2019, p. 2139-2155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ddacba43ecc44054a083400414aaedde,
title = "The politics of evidence-based policy in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’",
abstract = "Increased migration across the Mediterranean to Europe during 2015 was associated with growing interest in generating new research evidence to assist policymakers in understanding the complexities of migration and improve policy responses. In the UK, this was reflected in funding by the Economic and Social Research Council for a Mediterranean Migration Research Programme. Drawing on evidence from the programme, this volume explores the nature of Europe’s ‘migration crisis’ and the extent to which the development of new migration management policies was grounded in evidence about the causes, drivers and consequences of migration to Europe. The authors conclude that there is a substantial ‘gap’ between the now significant body of evidence examining migration processes and European Union policy responses. This gap is attributed to three main factors: the long-standing ‘paradigm war’ in social research between positivist, interpretivist and critical approaches which means that what counts as ‘evidence’ is contested; competing knowledge claims associated with research and other forms of evidence used to construct and/or support policy narratives; and, perhaps most importantly, the politics of policymaking, which has resulted in policies based on underlying assumptions and vested interests rather than research evidence, even where this evidence is funded directly by European governments.",
keywords = "Europe, evidence-based policy, migration, politics, research, Policy formulation",
author = "Martin Baldwin-Edwards and Brad Blitz and Heaven Crawley",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/1369183X.2018.1468307",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "2139--2155",
journal = "Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies",
issn = "1369-183X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The politics of evidence-based policy in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’

AU - Baldwin-Edwards, Martin

AU - Blitz, Brad

AU - Crawley, Heaven

PY - 2019/9/10

Y1 - 2019/9/10

N2 - Increased migration across the Mediterranean to Europe during 2015 was associated with growing interest in generating new research evidence to assist policymakers in understanding the complexities of migration and improve policy responses. In the UK, this was reflected in funding by the Economic and Social Research Council for a Mediterranean Migration Research Programme. Drawing on evidence from the programme, this volume explores the nature of Europe’s ‘migration crisis’ and the extent to which the development of new migration management policies was grounded in evidence about the causes, drivers and consequences of migration to Europe. The authors conclude that there is a substantial ‘gap’ between the now significant body of evidence examining migration processes and European Union policy responses. This gap is attributed to three main factors: the long-standing ‘paradigm war’ in social research between positivist, interpretivist and critical approaches which means that what counts as ‘evidence’ is contested; competing knowledge claims associated with research and other forms of evidence used to construct and/or support policy narratives; and, perhaps most importantly, the politics of policymaking, which has resulted in policies based on underlying assumptions and vested interests rather than research evidence, even where this evidence is funded directly by European governments.

AB - Increased migration across the Mediterranean to Europe during 2015 was associated with growing interest in generating new research evidence to assist policymakers in understanding the complexities of migration and improve policy responses. In the UK, this was reflected in funding by the Economic and Social Research Council for a Mediterranean Migration Research Programme. Drawing on evidence from the programme, this volume explores the nature of Europe’s ‘migration crisis’ and the extent to which the development of new migration management policies was grounded in evidence about the causes, drivers and consequences of migration to Europe. The authors conclude that there is a substantial ‘gap’ between the now significant body of evidence examining migration processes and European Union policy responses. This gap is attributed to three main factors: the long-standing ‘paradigm war’ in social research between positivist, interpretivist and critical approaches which means that what counts as ‘evidence’ is contested; competing knowledge claims associated with research and other forms of evidence used to construct and/or support policy narratives; and, perhaps most importantly, the politics of policymaking, which has resulted in policies based on underlying assumptions and vested interests rather than research evidence, even where this evidence is funded directly by European governments.

KW - Europe

KW - evidence-based policy

KW - migration

KW - politics

KW - research

KW - Policy formulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047832382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1468307

DO - 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1468307

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 2139

EP - 2155

JO - Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

JF - Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

SN - 1369-183X

IS - 12

ER -