The Myth of Televisual Ubiquity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Popular and journalistic discussions of television often present a rhetoric, which suggests that television has become ubiquitous, any content being able to be watched anytime, anywhere. This article argues that this represents a myth of televisual ubiquity, which neglects the role still played by national borders and which makes assumptions about the types of television of interest to people. By accepting the myth of televisual ubiquity, we are making assertions about the television experience of some viewers over others, as well as creating a distinction of which television can be seen to have lasting importance. The article analyzes the components of the myth of televisual ubiquity and draws them together to consider a case study, video on demand in New Zealand.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)691-705
Number of pages15
JournalTelevision & New Media
Volume17
Issue number8
Early online date21 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

television
myth
video on demand
national border
neglect
New Zealand
rhetoric
experience

Bibliographical note

Mark Stewart completed his PhD in 2015 at the University of Auckland, New Zealand, with a focus on the postnetwork period of television. He is currently a postdoctoral fellow at Massey University, working with Dr. Kevin Glynn and Dr. Julie Cupples on a project funded by the Marsden Fund of the Royal Society of New Zealand.

Funder

This research is supported by the Marsden Fund of the Royal Society of New Zealand, Grant MAU1108.

Keywords

  • Television
  • New Media
  • Digital Distribution
  • The Nation

Cite this

The Myth of Televisual Ubiquity. / Stewart, Mark.

In: Television & New Media, Vol. 17, No. 8, 01.12.2016, p. 691-705.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stewart, Mark. / The Myth of Televisual Ubiquity. In: Television & New Media. 2016 ; Vol. 17, No. 8. pp. 691-705.
@article{080164a2403e4445919609e0cb8fadd0,
title = "The Myth of Televisual Ubiquity",
abstract = "Popular and journalistic discussions of television often present a rhetoric, which suggests that television has become ubiquitous, any content being able to be watched anytime, anywhere. This article argues that this represents a myth of televisual ubiquity, which neglects the role still played by national borders and which makes assumptions about the types of television of interest to people. By accepting the myth of televisual ubiquity, we are making assertions about the television experience of some viewers over others, as well as creating a distinction of which television can be seen to have lasting importance. The article analyzes the components of the myth of televisual ubiquity and draws them together to consider a case study, video on demand in New Zealand.",
keywords = "Television, New Media, Digital Distribution, The Nation",
author = "Mark Stewart",
note = "Mark Stewart completed his PhD in 2015 at the University of Auckland, New Zealand, with a focus on the postnetwork period of television. He is currently a postdoctoral fellow at Massey University, working with Dr. Kevin Glynn and Dr. Julie Cupples on a project funded by the Marsden Fund of the Royal Society of New Zealand.",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1527476416655384",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "691--705",
journal = "Television and New Media",
issn = "1527-4764",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Myth of Televisual Ubiquity

AU - Stewart, Mark

N1 - Mark Stewart completed his PhD in 2015 at the University of Auckland, New Zealand, with a focus on the postnetwork period of television. He is currently a postdoctoral fellow at Massey University, working with Dr. Kevin Glynn and Dr. Julie Cupples on a project funded by the Marsden Fund of the Royal Society of New Zealand.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Popular and journalistic discussions of television often present a rhetoric, which suggests that television has become ubiquitous, any content being able to be watched anytime, anywhere. This article argues that this represents a myth of televisual ubiquity, which neglects the role still played by national borders and which makes assumptions about the types of television of interest to people. By accepting the myth of televisual ubiquity, we are making assertions about the television experience of some viewers over others, as well as creating a distinction of which television can be seen to have lasting importance. The article analyzes the components of the myth of televisual ubiquity and draws them together to consider a case study, video on demand in New Zealand.

AB - Popular and journalistic discussions of television often present a rhetoric, which suggests that television has become ubiquitous, any content being able to be watched anytime, anywhere. This article argues that this represents a myth of televisual ubiquity, which neglects the role still played by national borders and which makes assumptions about the types of television of interest to people. By accepting the myth of televisual ubiquity, we are making assertions about the television experience of some viewers over others, as well as creating a distinction of which television can be seen to have lasting importance. The article analyzes the components of the myth of televisual ubiquity and draws them together to consider a case study, video on demand in New Zealand.

KW - Television

KW - New Media

KW - Digital Distribution

KW - The Nation

U2 - 10.1177/1527476416655384

DO - 10.1177/1527476416655384

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 691

EP - 705

JO - Television and New Media

JF - Television and New Media

SN - 1527-4764

IS - 8

ER -