The moral decision making process of unauthorized downloading.

Eva Hofmann, Elfriede Penz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Unauthorised downloading has become an established behaviour in today's digital society, but the stages of individuals' decision-making processes guiding unauthorised downloading have been examined only fragmentarily. Comparing the different decision processes of intended downloaders and non-downloaders highlights aspects of the processes that can be modified for the benefit of digital society. The issue-contingent model of ethical decision-making in organisations (Jones, 1991) is applied to compare the decision-making process for the unauthorised downloading of digital leisure goods. Additionally, the impact of subfactors of moral intensity on the decision process is compared. Respondent groups differ in the effect of social consensus on the decision-making process. Additionally, the entire issue-contingent model is important in internet piracy research. From a practical view and based on social consensus results, it is essential for companies to establish sentiments that unauthorised downloading is an unacceptable behaviour within a specific social group that is highly relevant to downloaders
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-407
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Business Environment
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Decision making
Internet
Moral decision making
Decision-making process
Industry
Decision process
Ethical decision making
Sentiment
Moral intensity
Social groups
Leisure
Individual decision making
Piracy
World Wide Web

Keywords

  • file sharing
  • issue-contingent model
  • ethical decision making
  • ethics
  • internet piracy
  • leisure goods
  • moral intensity
  • moral decision making
  • unauthorised downloading
  • illegal downloading
  • digital goods
  • unacceptable behaviour

Cite this

The moral decision making process of unauthorized downloading. / Hofmann, Eva; Penz, Elfriede.

In: International Journal of Business Environment, Vol. 8, No. 4, 02.12.2016, p. 385-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hofmann, Eva ; Penz, Elfriede. / The moral decision making process of unauthorized downloading. In: International Journal of Business Environment. 2016 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 385-407.
@article{85d3a4b6fab94ce296853f308d3cb6af,
title = "The moral decision making process of unauthorized downloading.",
abstract = "Unauthorised downloading has become an established behaviour in today's digital society, but the stages of individuals' decision-making processes guiding unauthorised downloading have been examined only fragmentarily. Comparing the different decision processes of intended downloaders and non-downloaders highlights aspects of the processes that can be modified for the benefit of digital society. The issue-contingent model of ethical decision-making in organisations (Jones, 1991) is applied to compare the decision-making process for the unauthorised downloading of digital leisure goods. Additionally, the impact of subfactors of moral intensity on the decision process is compared. Respondent groups differ in the effect of social consensus on the decision-making process. Additionally, the entire issue-contingent model is important in internet piracy research. From a practical view and based on social consensus results, it is essential for companies to establish sentiments that unauthorised downloading is an unacceptable behaviour within a specific social group that is highly relevant to downloaders",
keywords = "file sharing, issue-contingent model, ethical decision making, ethics, internet piracy, leisure goods, moral intensity, moral decision making, unauthorised downloading, illegal downloading, digital goods, unacceptable behaviour",
author = "Eva Hofmann and Elfriede Penz",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1504/IJBE.2016.10001657",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "385--407",
journal = "International Journal of Business Environment",
issn = "1740-0589",
publisher = "Inderscience",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The moral decision making process of unauthorized downloading.

AU - Hofmann, Eva

AU - Penz, Elfriede

PY - 2016/12/2

Y1 - 2016/12/2

N2 - Unauthorised downloading has become an established behaviour in today's digital society, but the stages of individuals' decision-making processes guiding unauthorised downloading have been examined only fragmentarily. Comparing the different decision processes of intended downloaders and non-downloaders highlights aspects of the processes that can be modified for the benefit of digital society. The issue-contingent model of ethical decision-making in organisations (Jones, 1991) is applied to compare the decision-making process for the unauthorised downloading of digital leisure goods. Additionally, the impact of subfactors of moral intensity on the decision process is compared. Respondent groups differ in the effect of social consensus on the decision-making process. Additionally, the entire issue-contingent model is important in internet piracy research. From a practical view and based on social consensus results, it is essential for companies to establish sentiments that unauthorised downloading is an unacceptable behaviour within a specific social group that is highly relevant to downloaders

AB - Unauthorised downloading has become an established behaviour in today's digital society, but the stages of individuals' decision-making processes guiding unauthorised downloading have been examined only fragmentarily. Comparing the different decision processes of intended downloaders and non-downloaders highlights aspects of the processes that can be modified for the benefit of digital society. The issue-contingent model of ethical decision-making in organisations (Jones, 1991) is applied to compare the decision-making process for the unauthorised downloading of digital leisure goods. Additionally, the impact of subfactors of moral intensity on the decision process is compared. Respondent groups differ in the effect of social consensus on the decision-making process. Additionally, the entire issue-contingent model is important in internet piracy research. From a practical view and based on social consensus results, it is essential for companies to establish sentiments that unauthorised downloading is an unacceptable behaviour within a specific social group that is highly relevant to downloaders

KW - file sharing

KW - issue-contingent model

KW - ethical decision making

KW - ethics

KW - internet piracy

KW - leisure goods

KW - moral intensity

KW - moral decision making

KW - unauthorised downloading

KW - illegal downloading

KW - digital goods

KW - unacceptable behaviour

U2 - 10.1504/IJBE.2016.10001657

DO - 10.1504/IJBE.2016.10001657

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 385

EP - 407

JO - International Journal of Business Environment

JF - International Journal of Business Environment

SN - 1740-0589

IS - 4

ER -