Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The mixed-meal tolerance test as an appetite assay: methodological and practical considerations

  • James A. King
  • , Alice E. Thackray
  • , Catherine Gibbons
  • , Catia Martins
  • , David R. Broom
  • , David J. Stensel
  • , Dimitris Papamargaritis
  • , Frank Arsenyadis
  • , Graham Finlayson
  • , Gráinne Whelehan
  • , Javier T. Gonzalez
  • , John Blundell
  • , Kristine Beaulieu
  • , Lewis James
  • , Lore Metz
  • , Mark Hopkins
  • , Masashi Miyashita
  • , Scott A. Willis
  • , Vicky Drapeau
  • , David Thivel
    • Loughborough University
    • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre
    • University of Leeds
    • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • Waseda University
    • Chinese University of Hong Kong
    • University of Leicester
    • University of Bath
    • Université Clermont Auvergne
    • Université Laval

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    7 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Appetite control is a topic which attracts widespread interest given its importance to energy balance and obesity. In this research area, the mixed-meal tolerance test (MM-TT) has emerged as an ‘appetite regulation assay’, facilitating the dynamic assessment of appetite parameters (e.g. subjective appetite perceptions, appetite-related hormones, food reward) in response to an individual meal. The MM-TT is commonly employed in observational and experimental studies to examine population differences and intervention effects. Problematically, no practice standard exists for the MM-TT and protocols vary widely. This presents a challenge for researchers designing new MM-TTs and hampers the comparability of findings. Therefore, within this narrative review we sought to identify and discuss key methodological considerations inherent within a MM-TT. The scope of our review extends to evaluating participant familiarisation and methodological standardisation practices, test meal characteristics, appetite perception assessment, blood sampling techniques, measurement of appetite-related hormones and data handling/analysis. A checklist has been devised to summarise relevant methodological issues identified within this review. This checklist can be used as a tool by researchers to facilitate MM-TT design and promote greater standardisation/comparability between studies. This review highlights the need for broader standardisation of MM-TT procedures to support consistency across future research. Additional research is needed to strengthen the evidence base on which various recommendations are made, particularly relating to participant familiarisation and methodological standardisation practices. Additional scrutiny of less common outcomes employed in MM-TTs (not addressed here), such as diet-induced thermogenesis, gastric emptying and ad libitum energy intake, is also needed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2168-2183
    Number of pages16
    JournalInternational Journal of Obesity
    Volume49
    Issue number11
    Early online date30 Jul 2025
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

    Bibliographical note

    © The Author(s) 2025
    This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly
    from the copyright holder.

    Funding

    The research was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. FA was supported by the Wellcome Trust [223512/Z/21/Z] through the Leicestershire Healthcare Inequalities Improvement Doctoral Training Programme Fellowship.

    FundersFunder number
    National Institute for Health and Care Research
    National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre
    Wellcome Trust223512/Z/21/Z

      UN SDGs

      This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

      1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
        SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'The mixed-meal tolerance test as an appetite assay: methodological and practical considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this