The missing spirals of violence: Four waves of movement–countermovement contest in post-war Britain

Graham Macklin, Joel Busher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Since the Second World War, Great Britain has witnessed a recurring escalation and de-escalation of confrontations between extreme right-wing or anti-minority protest groups on the one hand and, on the other, militant anti-fascist or anti-racist groups, and latterly also a number of extreme Islamist groups. In this article, we trace the outline of four waves of these movement–countermovement contests in order to engage critically with ideas of what some academics have called “cumulative extremism (CE)”. Contrary to the tenor of much of the public, policy and academic debate around such contests, we draw attention to what we describe as the missing spirals of violence. In order to better explain and accommodate these empirical findings, we argue that it is important to resist the temptation to reduce “CE” to a process of “tit-for-tat” violence. We outline four factors that have been particularly important in shaping patterns of interactive escalation, de-escalation and non-escalation in the case studies described: the broader strategic aims of activist groups; dynamics of intra-movement control and leadership; the actions of and activist's interactions with state actors; and emergent movement cultures and identities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-68
Number of pages16
JournalBehavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

escalation
Violence
violence
Minority Groups
World War II
radicalism
Public Policy
Group
World War
protest
public policy
minority
leadership
Warfare
interaction
United Kingdom

Keywords

  • cumulative extremism
  • radicalisation
  • extreme right-wing
  • anti-fascism
  • British National Party
  • English Defence League

Cite this

@article{e4d90dc5774f40ec988d141f45b4503f,
title = "The missing spirals of violence: Four waves of movement–countermovement contest in post-war Britain",
abstract = "Since the Second World War, Great Britain has witnessed a recurring escalation and de-escalation of confrontations between extreme right-wing or anti-minority protest groups on the one hand and, on the other, militant anti-fascist or anti-racist groups, and latterly also a number of extreme Islamist groups. In this article, we trace the outline of four waves of these movement–countermovement contests in order to engage critically with ideas of what some academics have called “cumulative extremism (CE)”. Contrary to the tenor of much of the public, policy and academic debate around such contests, we draw attention to what we describe as the missing spirals of violence. In order to better explain and accommodate these empirical findings, we argue that it is important to resist the temptation to reduce “CE” to a process of “tit-for-tat” violence. We outline four factors that have been particularly important in shaping patterns of interactive escalation, de-escalation and non-escalation in the case studies described: the broader strategic aims of activist groups; dynamics of intra-movement control and leadership; the actions of and activist's interactions with state actors; and emergent movement cultures and identities.",
keywords = "cumulative extremism, radicalisation, extreme right-wing, anti-fascism, British National Party, English Defence League",
author = "Graham Macklin and Joel Busher",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/19434472.2014.977329",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "53--68",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Agression",
issn = "1943-4472",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The missing spirals of violence

T2 - Four waves of movement–countermovement contest in post-war Britain

AU - Macklin, Graham

AU - Busher, Joel

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Since the Second World War, Great Britain has witnessed a recurring escalation and de-escalation of confrontations between extreme right-wing or anti-minority protest groups on the one hand and, on the other, militant anti-fascist or anti-racist groups, and latterly also a number of extreme Islamist groups. In this article, we trace the outline of four waves of these movement–countermovement contests in order to engage critically with ideas of what some academics have called “cumulative extremism (CE)”. Contrary to the tenor of much of the public, policy and academic debate around such contests, we draw attention to what we describe as the missing spirals of violence. In order to better explain and accommodate these empirical findings, we argue that it is important to resist the temptation to reduce “CE” to a process of “tit-for-tat” violence. We outline four factors that have been particularly important in shaping patterns of interactive escalation, de-escalation and non-escalation in the case studies described: the broader strategic aims of activist groups; dynamics of intra-movement control and leadership; the actions of and activist's interactions with state actors; and emergent movement cultures and identities.

AB - Since the Second World War, Great Britain has witnessed a recurring escalation and de-escalation of confrontations between extreme right-wing or anti-minority protest groups on the one hand and, on the other, militant anti-fascist or anti-racist groups, and latterly also a number of extreme Islamist groups. In this article, we trace the outline of four waves of these movement–countermovement contests in order to engage critically with ideas of what some academics have called “cumulative extremism (CE)”. Contrary to the tenor of much of the public, policy and academic debate around such contests, we draw attention to what we describe as the missing spirals of violence. In order to better explain and accommodate these empirical findings, we argue that it is important to resist the temptation to reduce “CE” to a process of “tit-for-tat” violence. We outline four factors that have been particularly important in shaping patterns of interactive escalation, de-escalation and non-escalation in the case studies described: the broader strategic aims of activist groups; dynamics of intra-movement control and leadership; the actions of and activist's interactions with state actors; and emergent movement cultures and identities.

KW - cumulative extremism

KW - radicalisation

KW - extreme right-wing

KW - anti-fascism

KW - British National Party

KW - English Defence League

U2 - 10.1080/19434472.2014.977329

DO - 10.1080/19434472.2014.977329

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 53

EP - 68

JO - Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Agression

JF - Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Agression

SN - 1943-4472

IS - 1

ER -